win32 __stdcall function support

[Dave Hawkes]

Hi all,

I discovered that standard win32 api functions could not be called
directly due to the __stdcall modifier. I did a minor change to luabind
to support this and have included the patch (against r513) here in case
anyone else need to do this.

Dave Hawkes,
Cadlink Technology

Index: config.hpp
===================================================================
--- config.hpp    (revision 513)
+++ config.hpp    (working copy)
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 
 #ifdef BOOST_MSVC
     #define LUABIND_ANONYMOUS_FIX static
+    #define LUABIND_CALLTYPE __stdcall
 #else
     #define LUABIND_ANONYMOUS_FIX
 #endif
Index: function.hpp
===================================================================
--- function.hpp    (revision 513)
+++ function.hpp    (working copy)
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
 
 #include <luabind/scope.hpp>
 
+#define LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+
 namespace luabind
 {
     namespace detail
@@ -59,6 +61,14 @@
 
 #define BOOST_PP_ITERATION_PARAMS_1 (4, (0, LUABIND_MAX_ARITY,
<luabind/function.hpp>, 1))
 #include BOOST_PP_ITERATE()
+#ifdef LUABIND_CALLTYPE
+#undef LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+#define LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER LUABIND_CALLTYPE
+#define BOOST_PP_ITERATION_PARAMS_1 (4, (0, LUABIND_MAX_ARITY,
<luabind/function.hpp>, 1))
+#include BOOST_PP_ITERATE()
+#undef LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+#define LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+#endif  // LUABIND_CALLTYPE
 
                 inline bool operator==(const overload_rep& o) const
                 {
@@ -144,6 +154,14 @@
             {
                 #define BOOST_PP_ITERATION_PARAMS_1 (4, (0,
LUABIND_MAX_ARITY, <luabind/function.hpp>, 2))
                 #include BOOST_PP_ITERATE()
+                #ifdef LUABIND_CALLTYPE
+                #undef LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+                #define LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER LUABIND_CALLTYPE
+                #define BOOST_PP_ITERATION_PARAMS_1 (4, (0,
LUABIND_MAX_ARITY, <luabind/function.hpp>, 2))
+                #include BOOST_PP_ITERATE()
+                #undef LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+                #define LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+                #endif  // LUABIND_CALLTYPE
             };
 
             template<>
@@ -151,10 +169,26 @@
             {
                 #define BOOST_PP_ITERATION_PARAMS_1 (4, (0,
LUABIND_MAX_ARITY, <luabind/function.hpp>, 3))
                 #include BOOST_PP_ITERATE()
+                #ifdef LUABIND_CALLTYPE
+                #undef LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+                #define LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER LUABIND_CALLTYPE
+                #define BOOST_PP_ITERATION_PARAMS_1 (4, (0,
LUABIND_MAX_ARITY, <luabind/function.hpp>, 3))
+                #include BOOST_PP_ITERATE()
+                #undef LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+                #define LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+                #endif  // LUABIND_CALLTYPE
             };
 
             #define BOOST_PP_ITERATION_PARAMS_1 (4, (0,
LUABIND_MAX_ARITY, <luabind/function.hpp>, 4))
             #include BOOST_PP_ITERATE()
+            #ifdef LUABIND_CALLTYPE
+            #undef LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+            #define LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER LUABIND_CALLTYPE
+            #define BOOST_PP_ITERATION_PARAMS_1 (4, (0,
LUABIND_MAX_ARITY, <luabind/function.hpp>, 4))
+            #include BOOST_PP_ITERATE()
+            #undef LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+            #define LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+            #endif  // LUABIND_CALLTYPE
 
 
 #undef LUABIND_PARAMS
@@ -166,6 +200,14 @@
 
             #define BOOST_PP_ITERATION_PARAMS_1 (4, (0,
LUABIND_MAX_ARITY, <luabind/function.hpp>, 5))
             #include BOOST_PP_ITERATE()
+            #ifdef LUABIND_CALLTYPE
+            #undef LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+            #define LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER LUABIND_CALLTYPE
+            #define BOOST_PP_ITERATION_PARAMS_1 (4, (0,
LUABIND_MAX_ARITY, <luabind/function.hpp>, 5))
+            #include BOOST_PP_ITERATE()
+            #undef LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+            #define LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
+            #endif  // LUABIND_CALLTYPE
 
 
             template<class F, class Policies>
@@ -319,7 +361,7 @@
 #define LUABIND_ARITY(z,n,text) + BOOST_PP_CAT(p,n)::has_arg
 
 template<class R BOOST_PP_COMMA_IF(BOOST_PP_ITERATION())
BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), class A), class Policies>
-overload_rep(R(*f)(BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), A)),
Policies*)
+overload_rep(R(LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
*f)(BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), A)), Policies*)
     : fun(reinterpret_cast<void(*)()>(f))
 {
     m_params_.reserve(BOOST_PP_ITERATION());
@@ -336,7 +378,7 @@
 #elif BOOST_PP_ITERATION_FLAGS() == 2
 
 template<class Policies BOOST_PP_COMMA_IF(BOOST_PP_ITERATION())
BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), class A)>
-static int call(T(*f)(BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), A)),
lua_State* L, const Policies*)
+static int call(T(LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
*f)(BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), A)), lua_State* L, const
Policies*)
 {
     int nargs = lua_gettop(L);
 
@@ -364,12 +406,10 @@
     return maybe_yield<Policies>::apply(L, nret);
 }
 
-
-
 #elif BOOST_PP_ITERATION_FLAGS() == 3
 
 template<class Policies BOOST_PP_COMMA_IF(BOOST_PP_ITERATION())
BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), class A)>
-static int call(void(*f)(BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(),
A)), lua_State* L, const Policies*)
+static int call(void(LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
*f)(BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), A)), lua_State* L, const
Policies*)
 {
     int nargs = lua_gettop(L);
 
@@ -394,11 +434,10 @@
     return maybe_yield<Policies>::apply(L, nret);
 }
 
-
 #elif BOOST_PP_ITERATION_FLAGS() == 4
 
 template<class Policies, class R
BOOST_PP_COMMA_IF(BOOST_PP_ITERATION())
BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), class A)>
-int call(R(*f)(BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), A)),
lua_State* L, const Policies* policies)
+int call(R(LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
*f)(BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), A)), lua_State* L, const
Policies* policies)
 {
     return free_functions::returns<R>::call(f, L, policies);
 }
@@ -406,14 +445,12 @@
 #elif BOOST_PP_ITERATION_FLAGS() == 5
 
     template<class Policies, class R
BOOST_PP_COMMA_IF(BOOST_PP_ITERATION())
BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), class A)>
-    static int match(R(*)(BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(),
A)), lua_State* L, const Policies* policies)
+    static int match(R(LUABIND_CALLTYPE_ITER
*)(BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(), A)), lua_State* L, const
Policies* policies)
     {
         //if (lua_gettop(L) != BOOST_PP_ITERATION()) return -1;
         typedef constructor<BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_ITERATION(),
A)> ParameterTypes;
         return match_params(L, 1, static_cast<ParameterTypes*>(0),
policies);
     }
 
-
-
 #endif
 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
luabind-user mailing list
luabind-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luabind-user

[Daniel Wallin-4]

Dave Hawkes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I discovered that standard win32 api functions could not be called
> directly due to the __stdcall modifier. I did a minor change to luabind
> to support this and have included the patch (against r513) here in case
> anyone else need to do this.

Could you create a ticket for this on http://code.rasterbar.com/luabind 
and attach the patch there? It's hard to apply this because of the line
breaks.

--
Daniel Wallin
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
luabind-user mailing list
luabind-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luabind-user

[Dave Hawkes]

Daniel Wallin wrote:

> Dave Hawkes wrote:
>  
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I discovered that standard win32 api functions could not be called
>> directly due to the __stdcall modifier. I did a minor change to luabind
>> to support this and have included the patch (against r513) here in case
>> anyone else need to do this.
>>    
>
> Could you create a ticket for this on http://code.rasterbar.com/luabind 
> and attach the patch there? It's hard to apply this because of the line
> breaks.
>
>  

Done, ticket #66




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
luabind-user mailing list
luabind-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luabind-user