Geoff hendrey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing something like:
>
> SELECT
> "A"."C1" AS "A.C1",
> "A"."C2" AS "A.C2"
> FROM
> ATABLE AS "A"
> WHERE
> "A"."C1" = "X"
> ORDER BY
> PK
>
> Does it make sense that PK should be returned in the result set? I
> expected ONLY "A.C1" and "A.C2" to be the column names returned by
> JDBC...but I see "PK" as well. It may be a bug in my code somewhere
> else, or is it possible that the ORDER BY is forcing "PK" to be returned?
I think that it *is* due to the ORDER BY, and I think that it is
incorrect behavior. I noticed this myself a while back and tried
to pin it down, but I was having trouble isolating a standalone
reproducible test case.
If you can construct a simple standalone test program which demonstrates
this behavior, I think it would be great if you could log it into JIRA
so we can track it and study it more.
thanks,
bryan