> Hi!
>
>
> actually, that passage in the manual is rather old, TikZ can now do
> most of the things that pstricks can. (Sometimes I would not even have
> thought that we/I would be able to implement these things...).
>
> There is one thing where I think that pstricks will stay to be more
> powerful than tikz: Graphics in which text is used as a path or the
> base of a path. For instance, there are packages for creating "3D"
> letters, which are generated by using a normal text, turning it into a
> path, then doing some postscript magic to add "depth and lights". In
> pdf one simply cannot access text paths (partly for technical reasons,
> partly for copyright reasons), so I think it is more or less
> impossible to create these 3D letters as it is done in pstricks.
>
> Currently, I also think that the commands for connecting nodes are
> still more powerful in pstricks (although the syntax is not very
> good). But we are working on this...
>
> In general, pstricks has the great advantage that a lot of
> computational stuff can be left to the postscript interpreter, where
> pgf has to do the necessary computations inside TeX. For instance, if
> you use pstricks to plot a function, depending on the function,
> pstricks can store just the code of the function in the postscript
> file, which is very fast and simple. pgf, on the other hand, will have
> to evaluate all points of the function while TeX goes over the tex-
> file. This takes a lot of time and results in longer files.
>
>
> The main strengths of pgf are portability, better syntax (with TikZ),
> transparency, more powerful shapes/nodes. I also think that
> decorations are a pretty neat thing, which pstricks lacks.
>
>
> According to user feedback, it seems to be an advantage that pstricks
> has a short manual. A good book on TikZ would certainly help, here.
>
>
> Regards,
> Till
>
>
> Am 17.07.2008 um 10:12 schrieb Dan Drake:
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm giving a presentation in August about graphics tools for LaTeX.
>> Naturally I need to mention PSTricks and TikZ. In several places [1],
>> the TikZ manual mentions that since PSTricks is based on Postscript,
>> it
>> will always have capabilities that TikZ won't.
>>
>> I'm interested in some examples of things that are easy in PSTricks
>> that
>> are impossible or very difficult in PGF/TikZ -- and vice versa. I'm
>> not
>> trying to decide which system is "better", I just want to know some of
>> the differences between them, as well as the limitations and strengths
>> of each.
>>
>> Suggestions? Thanks!
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> [1]: Particularly section 1.2 (page 17 of the current manual).
>>
>> --
>> --- Dan Drake <
drake@...>
>> ----- KAIST Department of Mathematical Sciences
>> -------
http://math.kaist.ac.kr/~drake>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
>> challenge
>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win
>> great prizes
>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in
>> the world
>>
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/_______________________________________________>> pgf-users mailing list
>>
pgf-users@...
>>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pgf-users>>
>
> --
> Prof. Dr. Till Tantau <
tantau@...>
>
http://www.tcs.uni-luebeck.de>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/> _______________________________________________
> pgf-users mailing list
>
pgf-users@...
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pgf-users>
>
>
signature.asc (196 bytes)