Hi Paul,
Paul Hammant wrote:
>
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-hashmap.html>
> It's lower cost that full synchronization around set access (etc).
> Perhaps for DPC's lists/sets/maps of components-adapters.
>
> Thoughts?
Interesting article. However, did you already look at the code how we use those collections internally? The problem I see (and that's imlicitly addressed in the article) is, when we iterate over the items. You will (especially for maps) always iterate over the "old" items of the collection. We will have a very close look about our usage. An alternative might be the usage of the concurrent collection of JDK 5 though.
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
