|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
question: EVMS statusHey guys,
I have here a simple question. I have lately evaluated EVMS and found lots of problems. I also noticed that the last released was already more than a year old. (Feb 26, 2006), just want to ask if EVMS is still maintained? thanks a lot, warren ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Evms-devel mailing list Evms-devel@... To subscribe/unsubscribe, please visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/evms-devel |
|
|
Re: question: EVMS statusOn Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:37:56PM +0800, Warren Beldad wrote:
> I have lately evaluated EVMS and found lots of problems. I also noticed that > the last released was already more than a year old. (Feb 26, 2006), just > want to ask if EVMS is still maintained? IBM has pulled all resources from EVMS. Some of the people previously assigned to EVMS are doing some work in their spare time, but apart from that, it's pretty much unmaintained. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Evms-devel mailing list Evms-devel@... To subscribe/unsubscribe, please visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/evms-devel |
|
|
Re: question: EVMS statusok cool, thanks for the info.
I will be just posting some problems then. warren On 9/11/07, Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@...> wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:37:56PM +0800, Warren Beldad wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Evms-devel mailing list Evms-devel@... To subscribe/unsubscribe, please visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/evms-devel |
|
|
Re: question: EVMS statusOn Mon, 2007-09-10 at 22:46 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:37:56PM +0800, Warren Beldad wrote: > > I have lately evaluated EVMS and found lots of problems. I also noticed that > > the last released was already more than a year old. (Feb 26, 2006), just > > want to ask if EVMS is still maintained? > > IBM has pulled all resources from EVMS. Some of the people previously > assigned to EVMS are doing some work in their spare time, but apart from > that, it's pretty much unmaintained. Any idea why? I have a couple of servers with EVMS in use, and I'd hate to upgrade the kernel one day and have things blow up. Anyone know if support from IBM will return, or is this the honeymoon fading between IBM and Linux? Any alternative technologies people are using? Or is it back to plain old LVM? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Evms-devel mailing list Evms-devel@... To subscribe/unsubscribe, please visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/evms-devel |
|
|
Re: question: EVMS statusAm Mittwoch, 26. September 2007 schrieb ext Alan Bailward:
> On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 22:46 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:37:56PM +0800, Warren Beldad wrote: > > > I have lately evaluated EVMS and found lots of problems. I also > > > noticed that the last released was already more than a year old. (Feb > > > 26, 2006), just want to ask if EVMS is still maintained? > > > > IBM has pulled all resources from EVMS. Some of the people previously > > assigned to EVMS are doing some work in their spare time, but apart > > from that, it's pretty much unmaintained. > > Any idea why? I have a couple of servers with EVMS in use, and I'd hate > to upgrade the kernel one day and have things blow up. > Anyone know if > support from IBM will return, or is this the honeymoon fading between > IBM and Linux? I already asked them to officially call for a new maintainer. > Any alternative technologies people are using? Or is it back to plain > old LVM? EVMS uses all the alternative technologies, incl. plain old LVM, under the hood. So the only thing you would loose is the nice user interfaces. However, this is what I would hate, though. Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: dirk.heinrichs@... Wanheimerstraße 68 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40468 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Evms-devel mailing list Evms-devel@... To subscribe/unsubscribe, please visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/evms-devel |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |