pwgl-users: difference ksquant and grhythm?

[urisala]

Dear Kilian,
As far as from rhythm-related (not pitch) aspects are concerned, what  
are the main differences between grhythm and ksquant?
Greetings
Uri

[Kilian Sprotte-3]

Dear Uri,

actually, I would be curious myself to know more about the concepts involved in
the grhythm library. By the way, has there ever been something like a
paper written about it?

On a very superficial level, I can point you to one specialty of the
grhythm lib compared
to ksquant: The articulation info you add in form of percentage values:

((1 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/2 1/2) 50 100 100 100 100 100 100)

I am copying from the tutorial:

The grtm format is either a list of durations with a convention where
1 equals to a quarter note. Thus a grtm list consisting of a quarter
note, 4 sixteenth notes, and 2 eighth notes is written as follows:
(1 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/2 1/2)
The grtm format can also include articulation information that is
given after the duration list. The articulations are given in
percentage values, where 100 equals to 'legato', i.e. there is no
pause between events. If the value is smaller than 100 a rest is
introduced between events. Overlapping events will occur if the value
exceeds 100. Thus if we give 50 as the first articulation value (i.e.
we introduce an eighth note pause between the 2 first events), we have
the following grtm list:
((1 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/2 1/2) 50 100 100 100 100 100 100)

Best,
  Kilian



On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Uri Sala <urisala@...> wrote:
> Dear Kilian,
> As far as from rhythm-related (not pitch) aspects are concerned, what are
> the main differences between grhythm and ksquant?
> Greetings
> Uri
>

[urisala]

Is it possible to nest tuplets with ksquant?
For example, in the first 4 sixteenth notes of a quintuplet, to nest  
another quintuplet?

On TuesdayJun 3, at TueJun 3|21:49 , Kilian Sprotte wrote:

> Dear Uri,
>
> actually, I would be curious myself to know more about the concepts  
> involved in
> the grhythm library. By the way, has there ever been something like a
> paper written about it?
>
> On a very superficial level, I can point you to one specialty of the
> grhythm lib compared
> to ksquant: The articulation info you add in form of percentage  
> values:
>
> ((1 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/2 1/2) 50 100 100 100 100 100 100)
>
> I am copying from the tutorial:
>
> The grtm format is either a list of durations with a convention where
> 1 equals to a quarter note. Thus a grtm list consisting of a quarter
> note, 4 sixteenth notes, and 2 eighth notes is written as follows:
> (1 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/2 1/2)
> The grtm format can also include articulation information that is
> given after the duration list. The articulations are given in
> percentage values, where 100 equals to 'legato', i.e. there is no
> pause between events. If the value is smaller than 100 a rest is
> introduced between events. Overlapping events will occur if the value
> exceeds 100. Thus if we give 50 as the first articulation value (i.e.
> we introduce an eighth note pause between the 2 first events), we have
> the following grtm list:
> ((1 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/2 1/2) 50 100 100 100 100 100 100)
>
> Best,
>  Kilian
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Uri Sala <urisala@...> wrote:
>> Dear Kilian,
>> As far as from rhythm-related (not pitch) aspects are concerned,  
>> what are
>> the main differences between grhythm and ksquant?
>> Greetings
>> Uri
>>

[Kilian Sprotte-3]

Oops, I somehow overlooked this message, sorry.
For the time being, the answer is no....
I hope to make the quantizer more sophisticated at some point.

Best,
  Kilian

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Uri Sala <urisala@...> wrote:

> Is it possible to nest tuplets with ksquant?
> For example, in the first 4 sixteenth notes of a quintuplet, to nest another
> quintuplet?
>
> On TuesdayJun 3, at TueJun 3|21:49 , Kilian Sprotte wrote:
>
>> Dear Uri,
>>
>> actually, I would be curious myself to know more about the concepts
>> involved in
>> the grhythm library. By the way, has there ever been something like a
>> paper written about it?
>>
>> On a very superficial level, I can point you to one specialty of the
>> grhythm lib compared
>> to ksquant: The articulation info you add in form of percentage values:
>>
>> ((1 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/2 1/2) 50 100 100 100 100 100 100)
>>
>> I am copying from the tutorial:
>>
>> The grtm format is either a list of durations with a convention where
>> 1 equals to a quarter note. Thus a grtm list consisting of a quarter
>> note, 4 sixteenth notes, and 2 eighth notes is written as follows:
>> (1 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/2 1/2)
>> The grtm format can also include articulation information that is
>> given after the duration list. The articulations are given in
>> percentage values, where 100 equals to 'legato', i.e. there is no
>> pause between events. If the value is smaller than 100 a rest is
>> introduced between events. Overlapping events will occur if the value
>> exceeds 100. Thus if we give 50 as the first articulation value (i.e.
>> we introduce an eighth note pause between the 2 first events), we have
>> the following grtm list:
>> ((1 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/2 1/2) 50 100 100 100 100 100 100)
>>
>> Best,
>>  Kilian
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Uri Sala <urisala@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Kilian,
>>> As far as from rhythm-related (not pitch) aspects are concerned, what are
>>> the main differences between grhythm and ksquant?
>>> Greetings
>>> Uri
>>>
>
>