|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
newbe: can xjc generate enums classes from anonomous typeshi,
if I have a global simple type (restriction of xs:NCName) definition then xjc will generate an enum class, but if the simple type is nested inside another type declaration then it will not. |Is there a way to make xjc generate enums for all of these cases or do I have to extract all of the simple type declarations into global declarations so this schema <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified"> <xs:element name="def"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="ele"> <xs:simpleType> <xs:restriction base="xs:NCName"> <xs:enumeration value="one"/> <xs:enumeration value="two"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:element> </xs:sequence> <xs:attribute name="attr" use="required"> <xs:simpleType> <xs:restriction base="xs:NCName"> <xs:enumeration value="one"/> <xs:enumeration value="two"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:attribute> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:simpleType name="global-type"> <xs:restriction base="xs:NCName"> <xs:enumeration value="one"/> <xs:enumeration value="two"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:schema> generates public class Def { @XmlElement(required = true) @XmlJavaTypeAdapter(CollapsedStringAdapter.class) protected String ele; @XmlAttribute(required = true) @XmlJavaTypeAdapter(CollapsedStringAdapter.class) protected String attr; .... |
|
|
Re: newbe: can xjc generate enums classes from anonomous typesDon't you want enum Types for your one-two types?
The global simple-type should produce an enum type GlobalType anyway. Anonymous enumeration-restrictions won't result in enum types, not even nested ones. But you could instruct JAXB to use this class for your anonymous inlined types by inserting <xs:annotation><xs:appinfo> <xs:class ref="where.it.is.GlobalType"/> </..></..> in all your anonymous <xs:simpleType> definitions. It should also be possible to put this into an external bindings file, but then you would have to define the locations by XPATH expressions. This doesn't appeal to me. My advice would be to rewrite the schema, if possible. Wolfgang On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Mike Skells <mike.skells@...> wrote:
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |