Thanks to Mike Patton (
MAP@...) correctly pointed out that I
said the use case document included with my last message was from the
substrate working group. That was the group that provided the list of
overlapping areas I sent previous to this one. The use case document
is from the SERVICES working group, which also overlaps with OMIS. I
believe we will meet jointly with them as well at the next GENI
Engineering Conference, so please provide any feedback you have to both
lists. Sorry for the confusion.
_______________________________________________
omis-wg mailing list
omis-wg@...
http://lists.geni.net/mailman/listinfo/omis-wg
