intuos3 vs bamboo

View: New views
7 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Re: intuos3 vs bamboo

by Michael Palace :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Just a thought about having 128 steps of MIDI data as a limitation..

Since this discrete steps are most notable when slowly changing a filter or
oscillator pitch, when used in some software like PD or MAX, could a running
average be used or something related to the slope change of the values be
used extrapoliate values of 1-512 in the software code.  Slower changes can
estimate intermediate values, while fast changes it is not necessary.
Storing the previous cc# value should not be an issue in the software.

Not sure if this made sense.

Mike Palace
horchata

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kim Cascone" <kim@...>
To: "microsound_list" <microsound@...>
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 10:12 PM
Subject: [microsound] intuos3 vs bamboo


> <http://www.symbolicsound.com/cgi-bin/bin/view/Company/KymaX1Released>
>
> while not everyone has a Kyma system to play with I know that CNMAT  has
> used Wacom tablets for a long time now and there is a wacom Max  external
> on their site
> http://cnmat.berkeley.edu/downloads
>
> also the Intuos3 is a pricey controller at ~$200 USD has anyone used  the
> other Wacom tablet: 'Bamboo'?
> http://www.wacom.com/BambooTablet/index.cfm
>
> there are 512 levels of Z axis (pressure sensitivity) on the Bamboo  which
> is better than 128 of MIDI cc#...?
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@...
> website: http://www.microsound.org 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@...
website: http://www.microsound.org


intuos3 vs bamboo

by Kim Cascone :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

<http://www.symbolicsound.com/cgi-bin/bin/view/Company/KymaX1Released>

while not everyone has a Kyma system to play with I know that CNMAT  
has used Wacom tablets for a long time now and there is a wacom Max  
external on their site
http://cnmat.berkeley.edu/downloads

also the Intuos3 is a pricey controller at ~$200 USD has anyone used  
the other Wacom tablet: 'Bamboo'?
http://www.wacom.com/BambooTablet/index.cfm

there are 512 levels of Z axis (pressure sensitivity) on the Bamboo  
which is better than 128 of MIDI cc#...?



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@...
website: http://www.microsound.org


Re: intuos3 vs bamboo

by craquemattic :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

we actually just got a bamboo, it's an excellent tablet. amazon has a
good price on the medium, which is really what you need for good working
space.

i'd definitely recommend it if you're already considering a wacom and
just want a good price point. a professional story-boarder/designer
friend of mine uses the intuos but recommends the bamboo any day.

the mouse isn't especially useful, but it's really cool surfing the web
with a pen... i actually like the paradigm of "pull the page down"
instead of "scrollbar", effectively a reverse of the direction you move
your hand. strangely enough it feels more natural.

Kim Cascone wrote:

> <http://www.symbolicsound.com/cgi-bin/bin/view/Company/KymaX1Released>
>
> while not everyone has a Kyma system to play with I know that CNMAT has
> used Wacom tablets for a long time now and there is a wacom Max external
> on their site
> http://cnmat.berkeley.edu/downloads
>
> also the Intuos3 is a pricey controller at ~$200 USD has anyone used the
> other Wacom tablet: 'Bamboo'?
> http://www.wacom.com/BambooTablet/index.cfm
>
> there are 512 levels of Z axis (pressure sensitivity) on the Bamboo
> which is better than 128 of MIDI cc#...?
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@...
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@...
website: http://www.microsound.org


RE: intuos3 vs bamboo

by mat dalgleish :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


I have some experience in using both a Wacom Bamboo tablet and a much more expensive, larger tablet belonging to a graphic designer friend, and while both work quite well with the CNMAT external in Max, the pressure sensitivity of the Bamboo is one thing that lets it down. Although there are indeed 512 levels of pressure sensing, in practice these seem quite inconsistent. The surface of the tablet is also a little scratchy for my liking, certainly compared to the more expensive model. Despite these niggles, because of its price (about £70-80 here in the UK) an portability, the Bamboo remains quite an attractive proposition.

Mat



> To: microsound@...
> From: kim@...
> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:12:12 -0700
> Subject: [microsound] intuos3 vs bamboo
>
> <http://www.symbolicsound.com/cgi-bin/bin/view/Company/KymaX1Released>
>
> while not everyone has a Kyma system to play with I know that CNMAT  
> has used Wacom tablets for a long time now and there is a wacom Max  
> external on their site
> http://cnmat.berkeley.edu/downloads
>
> also the Intuos3 is a pricey controller at ~$200 USD has anyone used  
> the other Wacom tablet: 'Bamboo'?
> http://www.wacom.com/BambooTablet/index.cfm
>
> there are 512 levels of Z axis (pressure sensitivity) on the Bamboo  
> which is better than 128 of MIDI cc#...?
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@...
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>

_________________________________________________________________
The John Lewis Clearance - save up to 50% with FREE delivery
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/101719806/direct/01/

Re: intuos3 vs bamboo

by Frank Barknecht :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hallo,
Michael Palace hat gesagt: // Michael Palace wrote:

> Just a thought about having 128 steps of MIDI data as a limitation..
>
> Since this discrete steps are most notable when slowly changing a filter or
> oscillator pitch, when used in some software like PD or MAX, could a
> running average be used or something related to the slope change of the
> values be used extrapoliate values of 1-512 in the software code.  Slower
> changes can estimate intermediate values, while fast changes it is not
> necessary. Storing the previous cc# value should not be an issue in the
> software.
>
> Not sure if this made sense.

No, it makes perfect sense, and actually that's what people do in
their soft- or hardware. You often interpolate or filter or otherwise
map your input data to something better suited for your application.
However you also need to take care, because for example filtering with
a running sum or so adds a bit of latency.

If you use Pd, there's the "mapping" library which has lots of mapping
related objects, also some complex ones, for example to map the speed
of drawing circles on a gfx tablet to some value in your patch.

Ciao
--
 Frank Barknecht                                     _ ______footils.org__

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@...
website: http://www.microsound.org


Re: intuos3 vs bamboo

by frey :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Frank Barknecht schreef:
>> Just a thought about having 128 steps of MIDI data as a limitation..
>
> No, it makes perfect sense, and actually that's what people do in
> their soft- or hardware. You often interpolate or filter or otherwise
> map your input data to something better suited for your application.
> However you also need to take care, because for example filtering with
> a running sum or so adds a bit of latency.

the way i work with filters in my patches is to use a timer to measure
the amount of time between the last number sent and the next number, and
use this timer to set the interpolation time.

so to move very slow through the numbers i turn the knob slowly -
sending out eg 29, and 2 seconds later, 30, will interpolate between 29
and 30 over 2.2 seconds. to jump i turn the knob quickly - or at least,
make sure that several values come through in a short period of time.

i could perhaps make it nicer by doing some kind of quadratic
interpolation rather than linear interpolation, but this existing system
works well enough in practise.

d

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@...
website: http://www.microsound.org


Re: intuos3 vs bamboo

by frey :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Damian Stewart schreef:
> i could perhaps make it nicer by doing some kind of quadratic
> interpolation rather than linear interpolation, but this existing system
> works well enough in practise.

(hear it in action at http://www.frey.co.nz/blog/?p=279 )

-d

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@...
website: http://www.microsound.org