OK,
now I see that the the .contains method works with rects also. In the
docs it only says it works with points. Should be corrected, or th
.containsRect method should be added to the docs.
Nevertheless, I find the .sect results strange. shouldn't it return nil
in my example?
jostM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how can I determin if two rects intersect?
>
> the docs say that:
>
>
> sect(aRect)
> & aRect
>
> "returns a new Rect which is the intersection of the receiver and aRect."
>
> -------
>
> however if two rects don't intersect, I still get a (negative) rect:
>
> a=Rect(0,0,50,50);
> b=Rect(75,75,75,75);
>
>
> b.sect(a)
>
> however, this returns Rect(75, 75, -25, -25)
>
> is this a bug?
>
>
> jostM
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
>
sc-users@...
>
http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users>
_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list
sc-users@...
http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users
