hscurses under wrong category

View: New views
6 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

hscurses under wrong category

by Bas van Dijk-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hello,

I noticed that the hscurses package[1] is listed under category
"User-interface" while all other user interface packages are listed
under "User Interfaces".

Could someone please release hscurses under the "User Interfaces"
category and remove the current one? That will make it more
consistent.

Thanks

Bas

[1] http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/hscurses
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@...
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Re: hscurses under wrong category

by Don Stewart-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

v.dijk.bas:

> Hello,
>
> I noticed that the hscurses package[1] is listed under category
> "User-interface" while all other user interface packages are listed
> under "User Interfaces".
>
> Could someone please release hscurses under the "User Interfaces"
> category and remove the current one? That will make it more
> consistent.
>
> Thanks

In general we need a way for trusted users to tag and categorise
packages. Restricting uploaded categories would also help in the
ontology sprawl.
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@...
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Re: hscurses under wrong category

by Henning Thielemann :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Don Stewart wrote:

> v.dijk.bas:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed that the hscurses package[1] is listed under category
>> "User-interface" while all other user interface packages are listed
>> under "User Interfaces".
>>
>> Could someone please release hscurses under the "User Interfaces"
>> category and remove the current one? That will make it more
>> consistent.
>
> In general we need a way for trusted users to tag and categorise
> packages. Restricting uploaded categories would also help in the
> ontology sprawl.

I suggested that introduction of new categories should not be restricted,
but at least a warning and a question should be raised if you introduce a
new category, because it may only be the difference between "User
Interface" and "User-Interface". The downside is, that introducing new
categories in order to place "unique" packages is too tempting.
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@...
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Re: hscurses under wrong category

by Duncan Coutts :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 21:12 +0200, Henning Thielemann wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Don Stewart wrote:
>
> > v.dijk.bas:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I noticed that the hscurses package[1] is listed under category
> >> "User-interface" while all other user interface packages are listed
> >> under "User Interfaces".
> >>
> >> Could someone please release hscurses under the "User Interfaces"
> >> category and remove the current one? That will make it more
> >> consistent.
> >
> > In general we need a way for trusted users to tag and categorise
> > packages. Restricting uploaded categories would also help in the
> > ontology sprawl.
>
> I suggested that introduction of new categories should not be restricted,
> but at least a warning and a question should be raised if you introduce a
> new category, because it may only be the difference between "User
> Interface" and "User-Interface". The downside is, that introducing new
> categories in order to place "unique" packages is too tempting.

It is indeed already a warning.

Duncan

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@...
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Re: hscurses under wrong category

by Ross Paterson :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 01:04:11AM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 21:12 +0200, Henning Thielemann wrote:
> > I suggested that introduction of new categories should not be restricted,
> > but at least a warning and a question should be raised if you introduce a
> > new category, because it may only be the difference between "User
> > Interface" and "User-Interface". The downside is, that introducing new
> > categories in order to place "unique" packages is too tempting.
>
> It is indeed already a warning.

New top-level module hierarchies get a warning at the moment, but not
new categories.
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@...
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Re: hscurses under wrong category

by Gwern Branwen :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On 2008.07.03 20:56:19 +0200, Bas van Dijk <v.dijk.bas@...> scribbled 0.4K characters:

> Hello,
>
> I noticed that the hscurses package[1] is listed under category
> "User-interface" while all other user interface packages are listed
> under "User Interfaces".
>
> Could someone please release hscurses under the "User Interfaces"
> category and remove the current one? That will make it more
> consistent.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bas
>
> [1] http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/hscurses
Yes, I noticed that a while ago and fixed it in darcs Hscurses, but there haven't been any other changes to justify a reupload. If this really bothers you, I suppose I could increment the version number and upload; or perhaps a Hackage admin could delete so as to permit a reupload under the same version number.

--
gwern
Undercover burhop World 757 William BECCA Psyops veggie 3M Treasury


_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@...
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

signature.asc (196 bytes) Download Attachment