hello world ipk files: dbg and dev?

View: New views
8 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

hello world ipk files: dbg and dev?

by Chuck Randall :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I just ran through the Hello World OE tutorial (http://www.gumstix.net/Software/view/Build-system-overview/Hello-world-tutorial/111.html 
), and got everything to build. But now I'm at the point where the  
tutorial says:

     Installation is a two step process.
     First, from your build machine command line,
     copy the ipkg file to your gumstix using the scp utility:

     $ scp ~/gumstix/gumstix-oe/tmp/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/
helloworld_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk root(at)192.160.0.2:/home/root

A couple of questions:
1. What is "root(at)192.160.0.2:/home/root"? Shouldn't this be "root@...
:/home/root"?
2. In my ...tmp/deploy/glibc/ipk/arm5te directory, I don't have a file  
named "helloworld_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk", but I have 2 other helloworld  
packages:
     helloworld-dbg_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk
     helloworld-dev_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk
Why are there 2 packages, and which one should I use?
Chuck


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
gumstix-users mailing list
gumstix-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users

Re: hello world ipk files: dbg and dev?

by ericwade :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

If you are not getting the `helloworld_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk' package, there is a problem with your build. Check the error log for more info (and post it here perhaps). The package you are not getting is what needs to be scp'ed to the Gumstix, not the `dev' or `dbg' files.


Chuck Randall wrote:
I just ran through the Hello World OE tutorial (http://www.gumstix.net/Software/view/Build-system-overview/Hello-world-tutorial/111.html 
), and got everything to build. But now I'm at the point where the  
tutorial says:

     Installation is a two step process.
     First, from your build machine command line,
     copy the ipkg file to your gumstix using the scp utility:

     $ scp ~/gumstix/gumstix-oe/tmp/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/
helloworld_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk root(at)192.160.0.2:/home/root

A couple of questions:
1. What is "root(at)192.160.0.2:/home/root"? Shouldn't this be "root@192.160.0.2
:/home/root"?
2. In my ...tmp/deploy/glibc/ipk/arm5te directory, I don't have a file  
named "helloworld_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk", but I have 2 other helloworld  
packages:
     helloworld-dbg_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk
     helloworld-dev_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk
Why are there 2 packages, and which one should I use?
Chuck


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
gumstix-users mailing list
gumstix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users

Re: hello world ipk files: dbg and dev?

by Chuck Randall :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:50 AM, ericwade wrote:

>
> If you are not getting the `helloworld_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk'  
> package, there
> is a problem with your build. Check the error log for more info (and  
> post it
> here perhaps). The package you are not getting is what needs to be  
> scp'ed to
> the Gumstix, not the `dev' or `dbg' files.

There are a couple of "errors" in the build log, although at the end  
it says "0 failed". Should it really take 229 tasks to generate a  
Hello World ipk? FWIW, I'm on a Ubuntu 7.10 system, building for a  
connex-400xm (u-boot 1.2.0 and build 1604).

Chuck



$ bitbake helloworld
NOTE: Psyco JIT Compiler (http://psyco.sf.net) not available. Install  
it to increase performance.
NOTE: Handling BitBake files: \ (4956/4956) [100 %]
NOTE: Parsing finished. 4719 cached, 1 parsed, 236 skipped, 0 masked.
NOTE: build 200807101808: started

OE Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION     = "1.8.10"
OE_REVISION    = "<unknown>"
TARGET_ARCH    = "arm"
TARGET_OS      = "linux-gnueabi"
MACHINE        = "gumstix-custom-connex"
DISTRO         = "angstrom"
DISTRO_VERSION = "2007.9-test-20080711"
TARGET_FPU     = "soft"

NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc not available (for item virtual/
arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libc-for-gcc)
NOTE: Preparing runqueue
NOTE: Executing runqueue
NOTE: Running task 175 of 229 (ID: 10, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb, do_fetch)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_fetch: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_fetch: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Running task 176 of 229 (ID: 9, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb, do_unpack)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_unpack: started
NOTE: Unpacking /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/user.collection/
packages/helloworld/files/hello.c to /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
tmp/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/helloworld-1.0.0-r0/
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_unpack: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Running task 190 of 229 (ID: 8, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb, do_patch)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_patch: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_patch: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Running task 191 of 229 (ID: 5, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb, do_configure)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_configure: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_configure: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Running task 201 of 229 (ID: 6, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb,  
do_qa_configure)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_qa_configure: started
NOTE: Checking sanity of the config.log file
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_qa_configure: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Running task 202 of 229 (ID: 7, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb, do_compile)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_compile: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_compile: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Running task 203 of 229 (ID: 11, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb, do_install)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_install: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_install: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Running task 212 of 229 (ID: 0, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb, do_package)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_package: started
NOTE: the following files were installed but not shipped in any package:
NOTE:   /usr/bin/hello
NOTE: DO PACKAGE QA
NOTE: Checking Package: helloworld-dbg
NOTE: Checking Package: helloworld
NOTE: Checking Package: helloworld-doc
NOTE: Checking Package: helloworld-dev
NOTE: Checking Package: helloworld-locale
NOTE: DONE with PACKAGE QA
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_package: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Running task 217 of 229 (ID: 2, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb,  
do_populate_staging)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_populate_staging: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_populate_staging: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Running task 226 of 229 (ID: 12, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb,  
do_package_write_ipk)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_package_write_ipk: started
Packaged contents of helloworld-dbg into /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-
oe/tmp/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/helloworld-dbg_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk
NOTE: Not creating empty archive for helloworld-1.0.0-r0
NOTE: Not creating empty archive for helloworld-doc-1.0.0-r0
Packaged contents of helloworld-dev into /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-
oe/tmp/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/helloworld-dev_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk
NOTE: Not creating empty archive for helloworld-locale-1.0.0-r0
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_package_write_ipk: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Running task 227 of 229 (ID: 3, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb, do_qa_staging)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_qa_staging: started
NOTE: QA checking staging
ERROR: QA issue: libmudflapth.la failed sanity test (reference to  
workdir or installed)
ERROR: QA issue: libsupc++.la failed sanity test (reference to workdir  
or installed)
ERROR: QA issue: libmudflap.la failed sanity test (reference to  
workdir or installed)
ERROR: QA issue: libstdc++.la failed sanity test (reference to workdir  
or installed)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_qa_staging: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Running task 228 of 229 (ID: 1, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb,  
do_package_write)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_package_write: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_package_write: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Running task 229 of 229 (ID: 4, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb, do_build)
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_build: started
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_build: completed
NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 229 tasks of which 216 didn't need to  
be rerun and 0 failed.
NOTE: build 200807101808: completed
$




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
gumstix-users mailing list
gumstix-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users

Re: hello world ipk files: dbg and dev?

by Pierre Johnson :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Try changing the revision number in your .bb file ...

Pr = "r0" --> Pr = "r1"

Re: hello world ipk files: dbg and dev?

by Chuck Randall :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Jul 11, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Pierre Johnson wrote:
>
> Try changing the revision number in your .bb file ...
>
> Pr = "r0" --> Pr = "r1"

Same result. Now I have 4 helloworld ipk files in ...glibc/ipk/armv5te:

     helloworld-dbg_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk
     helloworld-dev_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk
     helloworld-dbg_1.0.0-r1_armv5te.ipk
     helloworld-dev_1.0.0-r1_armv5te.ipk

Do these "errors" mean anything:

ERROR: QA issue: libmudflapth.la failed sanity test (reference to
workdir or installed)
ERROR: QA issue: libsupc++.la failed sanity test (reference to workdir
or installed)
ERROR: QA issue: libmudflap.la failed sanity test (reference to
workdir or installed)
ERROR: QA issue: libstdc++.la failed sanity test (reference to workdir
or installed)

Maybe these libraries need ranlib'ing or something?
Chuck


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
gumstix-users mailing list
gumstix-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users

Re: hello world ipk files: dbg and dev?

by Stephen Farnsworth :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I was wondering why and how it made dev and debug packages the other
day, but blew it off. How does bitbake produce these packages? Does it
compile with different options, like including debug information? and
does it know whick header files to include in dev?



On 7/11/08, Chuck Randall <shibboleth@...> wrote:

> On Jul 11, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Pierre Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Try changing the revision number in your .bb file ...
>>
>> Pr = "r0" --> Pr = "r1"
>
> Same result. Now I have 4 helloworld ipk files in ...glibc/ipk/armv5te:
>
>      helloworld-dbg_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk
>      helloworld-dev_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk
>      helloworld-dbg_1.0.0-r1_armv5te.ipk
>      helloworld-dev_1.0.0-r1_armv5te.ipk
>
> Do these "errors" mean anything:
>
> ERROR: QA issue: libmudflapth.la failed sanity test (reference to
> workdir or installed)
> ERROR: QA issue: libsupc++.la failed sanity test (reference to workdir
> or installed)
> ERROR: QA issue: libmudflap.la failed sanity test (reference to
> workdir or installed)
> ERROR: QA issue: libstdc++.la failed sanity test (reference to workdir
> or installed)
>
> Maybe these libraries need ranlib'ing or something?
> Chuck
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
> _______________________________________________
> gumstix-users mailing list
> gumstix-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users
>

--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
gumstix-users mailing list
gumstix-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users

Re: hello world ipk files: dbg and dev?

by Chuck Randall :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Okay...

Any ideas on what to do now?
Could it somehow be the libraries it's complaining about?
Am I dead in the water with OE?

Chuck

On Jul 11, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Chuck Randall wrote:

> On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:50 AM, ericwade wrote:
>
>>
>> If you are not getting the `helloworld_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk'
>> package, there
>> is a problem with your build. Check the error log for more info (and
>> post it
>> here perhaps). The package you are not getting is what needs to be
>> scp'ed to
>> the Gumstix, not the `dev' or `dbg' files.
>
> There are a couple of "errors" in the build log, although at the end
> it says "0 failed". Should it really take 229 tasks to generate a
> Hello World ipk? FWIW, I'm on a Ubuntu 7.10 system, building for a
> connex-400xm (u-boot 1.2.0 and build 1604).
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> $ bitbake helloworld
> NOTE: Psyco JIT Compiler (http://psyco.sf.net) not available. Install
> it to increase performance.
> NOTE: Handling BitBake files: \ (4956/4956) [100 %]
> NOTE: Parsing finished. 4719 cached, 1 parsed, 236 skipped, 0 masked.
> NOTE: build 200807101808: started
>
> OE Build Configuration:
> BB_VERSION     = "1.8.10"
> OE_REVISION    = "<unknown>"
> TARGET_ARCH    = "arm"
> TARGET_OS      = "linux-gnueabi"
> MACHINE        = "gumstix-custom-connex"
> DISTRO         = "angstrom"
> DISTRO_VERSION = "2007.9-test-20080711"
> TARGET_FPU     = "soft"
>
> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc not available (for item virtual/
> arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libc-for-gcc)
> NOTE: Preparing runqueue
> NOTE: Executing runqueue
> NOTE: Running task 175 of 229 (ID: 10, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/
> user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb, do_fetch)
> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_fetch: started
> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_fetch: completed
> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
. . .
> ERROR: QA issue: libmudflapth.la failed sanity test (reference to
> workdir or installed)
> ERROR: QA issue: libsupc++.la failed sanity test (reference to workdir
> or installed)
> ERROR: QA issue: libmudflap.la failed sanity test (reference to
> workdir or installed)
> ERROR: QA issue: libstdc++.la failed sanity test (reference to workdir
> or installed)
. . .
> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_build: started
> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_build: completed
> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
> NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 229 tasks of which 216 didn't need to
> be rerun and 0 failed.
> NOTE: build 200807101808: completed
> $
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
gumstix-users mailing list
gumstix-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users

Re: hello world ipk files: dbg and dev?

by Chuck Randall :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Here's the contents of one of the .la files (libmudflap.la). It does  
indicate that the library is installed and has a reference to my build  
area, under my account. Why would that pose a problem, flagging an  
error? Or perhaps this is not the reason OE isn't building the ipk file?

Chuck


# libmudflap.la - a libtool library file
# Generated by ltmain.sh - GNU libtool 1.4a-GCC3.0 (1.641.2.256  
2001/05/28 20:09:07 with GCC-local changes)
#
# Please DO NOT delete this file!
# It is necessary for linking the library.

# The name that we can dlopen(3).
dlname='libmudflap.so.0'

# Names of this library.
library_names='libmudflap.so.0.0.0 libmudflap.so.0 libmudflap.so'

# The name of the static archive.
old_library='libmudflap.a'

# Libraries that this one depends upon.
dependency_libs=' -L/home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/tmp/staging/i686-
linux/lib -ldl'

# Version information for libmudflap.
current=0
age=0
revision=0

# Is this an already installed library?
installed=yes

# Files to dlopen/dlpreopen
dlopen=''
dlpreopen=''

# Directory that this library needs to be installed in:
libdir='/home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-oe/tmp/cross/arm-angstrom-linux-
gnueabi/lib'




On Jul 14, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Chuck Randall wrote:

> Okay...
>
> Any ideas on what to do now?
> Could it somehow be the libraries it's complaining about?
> Am I dead in the water with OE?
>
> Chuck
>
> On Jul 11, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Chuck Randall wrote:
>
>> On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:50 AM, ericwade wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> If you are not getting the `helloworld_1.0.0-r0_armv5te.ipk'
>>> package, there
>>> is a problem with your build. Check the error log for more info (and
>>> post it
>>> here perhaps). The package you are not getting is what needs to be
>>> scp'ed to
>>> the Gumstix, not the `dev' or `dbg' files.
>>
>> There are a couple of "errors" in the build log, although at the end
>> it says "0 failed". Should it really take 229 tasks to generate a
>> Hello World ipk? FWIW, I'm on a Ubuntu 7.10 system, building for a
>> connex-400xm (u-boot 1.2.0 and build 1604).
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> $ bitbake helloworld
>> NOTE: Psyco JIT Compiler (http://psyco.sf.net) not available. Install
>> it to increase performance.
>> NOTE: Handling BitBake files: \ (4956/4956) [100 %]
>> NOTE: Parsing finished. 4719 cached, 1 parsed, 236 skipped, 0 masked.
>> NOTE: build 200807101808: started
>>
>> OE Build Configuration:
>> BB_VERSION     = "1.8.10"
>> OE_REVISION    = "<unknown>"
>> TARGET_ARCH    = "arm"
>> TARGET_OS      = "linux-gnueabi"
>> MACHINE        = "gumstix-custom-connex"
>> DISTRO         = "angstrom"
>> DISTRO_VERSION = "2007.9-test-20080711"
>> TARGET_FPU     = "soft"
>>
>> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
>> NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc not available (for item virtual/
>> arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libc-for-gcc)
>> NOTE: Preparing runqueue
>> NOTE: Executing runqueue
>> NOTE: Running task 175 of 229 (ID: 10, /home/chuck/gumstix/gumstix-
>> oe/
>> user.collection/packages/helloworld/helloworld_1.0.0.bb, do_fetch)
>> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
>> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_fetch: started
>> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_fetch: completed
>> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
> . . .
>> ERROR: QA issue: libmudflapth.la failed sanity test (reference to
>> workdir or installed)
>> ERROR: QA issue: libsupc++.la failed sanity test (reference to  
>> workdir
>> or installed)
>> ERROR: QA issue: libmudflap.la failed sanity test (reference to
>> workdir or installed)
>> ERROR: QA issue: libstdc++.la failed sanity test (reference to  
>> workdir
>> or installed)
> . . .
>> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: started
>> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_build: started
>> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0-r0: task do_build: completed
>> NOTE: package helloworld-1.0.0: completed
>> NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 229 tasks of which 216 didn't need to
>> be rerun and 0 failed.
>> NOTE: build 200807101808: completed
>> $
>>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
> _______________________________________________
> gumstix-users mailing list
> gumstix-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
gumstix-users mailing list
gumstix-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users