|
View:
New views
20 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
| < Prev | 1 - 2 - 3 | Next > |
|
|
du-guidelines - point 7Hi,
In the Debian-User Guidelines: http://people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/du-guidelines.html Point #7 says: "... Also, you need not change the title of thread when saying "thanks" or "solved the problem". Some email clients might not handle threads appropriately when changing the subject of conversations." Is this still the case? I have considered that having [solved] or something similar in the subject is a handy thing. Maybe, politely suggesting they get a better email client would be a better solution? Good work by Kamaraju Kusumanchi on this. It would be good to see it added to the .sig with the howto (un)subscribe message already added to each message. -- Chris. ====== "One, with God, is always a majority, but many a martyr has been burned at the stake while the votes were being counted." -- Thomas B. Reed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: du-guidelines - point 7Chris Bannister wrote:
> Hi, > > In the Debian-User Guidelines: > http://people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/du-guidelines.html > > Point #7 says: > "... Also, you need not change the title of thread when saying "thanks" > or "solved the problem". Some email clients might not handle threads > appropriately when changing the subject of conversations." > > Is this still the case? I have considered that having [solved] or > something similar in the subject is a handy thing. I believe so. gmail web interface is one popular example. If the tilte changes, it will be in different "conversation". > > Good work by Kamaraju Kusumanchi on this. Thanks for the kind words. raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: du-guidelines - point 7On Mon,14.Jul.08, 18:10:15, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > In the Debian-User Guidelines: > > http://people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/du-guidelines.html > > > > Point #7 says: > > "... Also, you need not change the title of thread when saying "thanks" > > or "solved the problem". Some email clients might not handle threads > > appropriately when changing the subject of conversations." > > > > Is this still the case? I have considered that having [solved] or > > something similar in the subject is a handy thing. > > I believe so. gmail web interface is one popular example. If the tilte > changes, it will be in different "conversation". participated :) This is very useful if I have a big backlog from d-u. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) |
|
|
Re: du-guidelines - point 7On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 18:10 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > In the Debian-User Guidelines: > > http://people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/du-guidelines.html > > > > Point #7 says: > > "... Also, you need not change the title of thread when saying "thanks" > > or "solved the problem". Some email clients might not handle threads > > appropriately when changing the subject of conversations." > > > > Is this still the case? I have considered that having [solved] or > > something similar in the subject is a handy thing. > > I believe so. gmail web interface is one popular example. If the tilte > changes, it will be in different "conversation". it's propensity to send HTML when the user wasn't expecting to, and it's brutal lack of Reply to Mailing List and poor threading. -- Paul Johnson baloo@... |
|
|
Re: du-guidelines - point 7> GMail is known buggy and not suitable for mailing list use, if only for
> it's propensity to send HTML when the user wasn't expecting to, and it's > brutal lack of Reply to Mailing List and poor threading. And yet, it's free-as-in-beer, without having to expose your home system to the vulnerabilities associated with running your own mail server, and its thread-collapsing system and effective search features make it heaps easier to store debugging steps and solutions from the ML and even find them again later. Granted, you have to be comfortable with your mail being stored on an untrusted server; and setting up encryption and signing in Gmail is something I've yet to attempt... but there are pros as well as cons. If anyone is wondering, the "settings" button in the upper right corner can be used to easily configure a text-based reply mode. Looks like it even auto-wraps to a character count (although I haven't been playing with it in text-mode enough lately to speak). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: du-guidelines - point 7On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:22:29 -0400
"Jeff Soules" <soules@...> wrote: > > GMail is known buggy and not suitable for mailing list use, if only for > > it's propensity to send HTML when the user wasn't expecting to, and it's > > brutal lack of Reply to Mailing List and poor threading. > > And yet, it's free-as-in-beer, without having to expose your home system > to the vulnerabilities associated with running your own mail server, and its > thread-collapsing system and effective search features make it heaps > easier to store debugging steps and solutions from the ML and even find > them again later. Granted, you have to be comfortable with your mail > being stored on an untrusted server; and setting up encryption and > signing in Gmail is something I've yet to attempt... but there > are pros as well as cons. Note that Gmail can be used via POP or IMAP, without the web interface, as I and others on the list use it. One still gets the free-as-in-beer mail service and storage space, but is free to use 'proper' software (fetchmail / getmail, MUA, gpg, procmail / maildrop, etc.) in conjunction with it. I do occasionally use the web interface for the excellent search capability, and checking the spam folder for false positives (of which there often are). Celejar -- mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
[OT] GMail troubles [Was: Re: du-guidelines - point 7]On Mon,14.Jul.08, 20:44:32, Celejar wrote:
> Note that Gmail can be used via POP or IMAP, without the web interface, I'm wondering, did any of you have problems lately with that? Quite often in the last weeks I get a mail from my getmail cronjob that my password was rejected. If I go to the webinterface I am requested to pass a captcha test. This is getting pretty annoying! Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) |
|
|
Re: [OT] GMail troubles [Was: Re: du-guidelines - point 7]Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,14.Jul.08, 20:44:32, Celejar wrote: > >> Note that Gmail can be used via POP or IMAP, without the web interface, > > I'm wondering, did any of you have problems lately with that? Quite > often in the last weeks I get a mail from my getmail cronjob that my > password was rejected. > > If I go to the webinterface I am requested to pass a captcha test. This > is getting pretty annoying! I'm having this all the time as well. I use Thunderbird with IMAP with two different Google Apps accounts, and the passwords for both just spontaneously stop working for a while, and then start working again shortly. The whole reason I switched to Google Apps was to make flakiness like this go away, grrr... -david -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: [OT] GMail troubles [Was: Re: du-guidelines - point 7]-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 07/14/08 20:34, David Barrett wrote: > Andrei Popescu wrote: >> On Mon,14.Jul.08, 20:44:32, Celejar wrote: >> >>> Note that Gmail can be used via POP or IMAP, without the web interface, >> >> I'm wondering, did any of you have problems lately with that? Quite >> often in the last weeks I get a mail from my getmail cronjob that my >> password was rejected. >> >> If I go to the webinterface I am requested to pass a captcha test. >> This is getting pretty annoying! > > I'm having this all the time as well. I use Thunderbird with IMAP with > two different Google Apps accounts, and the passwords for both just > spontaneously stop working for a while, and then start working again > shortly. > > The whole reason I switched to Google Apps was to make flakiness like > this go away, grrr... I keep telling people that Gmail is evil, but no one will listen. If you care about your data, and want to get to it at any time, keep your data and your apps on your local machine. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New York is doomed." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkh8AV8ACgkQS9HxQb37Xmd3+gCeOiVZvLWY+C3GfRMZ8ysrx8HM XAwAoM3OxG+GB7VUw6BGUVBxjs1IxZJO =FIbb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: [OT] GMail troubles [Was: Re: du-guidelines - point 7]On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:46:07 -0500
Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@...> wrote: > I keep telling people that Gmail is evil, but no one will listen. > > If you care about your data, and want to get to it at any time, keep > your data and your apps on your local machine. So what would you recommend for a free, ISP-independent email service with IMAP and a sensible amount of storage space? The reason I use Gmail is because there is no way I can set up everything for email on a local server (not the least of which preventing this is the restrictions of a consumer-level ISP) and no other free mail service provides the same benefits as Gmail. -- Brian |
|
|
Re: [OT] GMail troubles [Was: Re: du-guidelines - point 7]-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 07/14/08 21:04, Brian Marshall wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:46:07 -0500 > Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@...> wrote: > >> I keep telling people that Gmail is evil, but no one will listen. >> >> If you care about your data, and want to get to it at any time, keep >> your data and your apps on your local machine. > > So what would you recommend for a free, ISP-independent email service > with IMAP and a sensible amount of storage space? > > The reason I use Gmail is because there is no way I can set up > everything for email on a local server Why not? Unless I am misunderstanding you, it's perfectly possible. Here's a link to an emal from just last week about someone doing that: http://lists-archives.org/debian-user/3509138-imap-is-teh-r0x0rz.html > (not the least of which > preventing this is the restrictions of a consumer-level ISP) and no > other free mail service provides the same benefits as Gmail. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New York is doomed." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkh8DtoACgkQS9HxQb37Xme5HgCg47SbykcMKwEwsm0sPL+S4aMI EbsAoKxcxKpFDLANMv8FHYbhCIx2g69l =9xLZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: [OT] GMail troubles [Was: Re: du-guidelines - point 7]On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:43:38 -0500
Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@...> wrote: > On 07/14/08 21:04, Brian Marshall wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:46:07 -0500 > > Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@...> wrote: > > > >> I keep telling people that Gmail is evil, but no one will listen. > >> > >> If you care about your data, and want to get to it at any time, > >> keep your data and your apps on your local machine. > > > > So what would you recommend for a free, ISP-independent email > > service with IMAP and a sensible amount of storage space? > > > > The reason I use Gmail is because there is no way I can set up > > everything for email on a local server > > Why not? Unless I am misunderstanding you, it's perfectly possible. > Here's a link to an emal from just last week about someone doing > that: > http://lists-archives.org/debian-user/3509138-imap-is-teh-r0x0rz.html have a residential ISP package with a dynamic IP and the only domain pointing towards it is free from DynDNS. I don't find myself in the situation to run a complete mail package like what Gmail and others provide. -- Brian |
|
|
Re: [OT] GMail troubles [Was: Re: du-guidelines - point 7]-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 07/14/08 22:41, Brian Marshall wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:43:38 -0500 > Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@...> wrote: > >> On 07/14/08 21:04, Brian Marshall wrote: >>> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:46:07 -0500 >>> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@...> wrote: >>> >>>> I keep telling people that Gmail is evil, but no one will listen. >>>> >>>> If you care about your data, and want to get to it at any time, >>>> keep your data and your apps on your local machine. >>> So what would you recommend for a free, ISP-independent email >>> service with IMAP and a sensible amount of storage space? >>> >>> The reason I use Gmail is because there is no way I can set up >>> everything for email on a local server >> Why not? Unless I am misunderstanding you, it's perfectly possible. >> Here's a link to an emal from just last week about someone doing >> that: >> http://lists-archives.org/debian-user/3509138-imap-is-teh-r0x0rz.html > > Maybe I am just misunderstanding you or the ramifications, but I only > have a residential ISP package with a dynamic IP and the only domain > pointing towards it is free from DynDNS. I don't find myself in the > situation to run a complete mail package like what Gmail and others > provide. I'm certain that you *are* running a "complete mail package" and don't even know it! :O Just about all Unix systems use the same MTA[0] to transfer intra- system mail as they do to transfer mail across the world. Exim is the Debian default, but many replace it with Postfix. Most people must configure their MUA to send email to smtp.bigisp.net, and receive mail from pop.bigisp.net. But with Unix (and Debian makes this very easy) you can configure your MTA to be a relayhost[1]. The way I've configured my system. Thus, in Icedove, I don't set the smtp server to be smtp.east.cox.net but "haggis", which is my machine's name. The MTA (Postfix, in my case) then routes the email to smtp.east.cox.net which then takes it and sends it on to it's final destination. Conversely, fetchmail retrieves my mail from pop.east.cox.net then passes it to Postfix (which feeds it thru Spam Assassin) and then to an IMAP server running on my desktop. That's where I (and my wife and children) read our email from, anywhere on our LAN. [0]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_transfer_agent [1]http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html#relayhost - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New York is doomed." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkh8JJ0ACgkQS9HxQb37Xmc+1gCeNbHMm8kCugVDDSA+YeWlvtQs QdgAoLfVcj4/oGSTq6/UTFHS65O2nwiP =F0H5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: [OT] GMail troubles [Was: Re: du-guidelines - point 7]On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:16:29 -0500
Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@...> wrote: > On 07/14/08 22:41, Brian Marshall wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:43:38 -0500 > > Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@...> wrote: > > > >> On 07/14/08 21:04, Brian Marshall wrote: > >>> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:46:07 -0500 > >>> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@...> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I keep telling people that Gmail is evil, but no one will listen. > >>>> > >>>> If you care about your data, and want to get to it at any time, > >>>> keep your data and your apps on your local machine. > >>> So what would you recommend for a free, ISP-independent email > >>> service with IMAP and a sensible amount of storage space? > >>> > >>> The reason I use Gmail is because there is no way I can set up > >>> everything for email on a local server > >> Why not? Unless I am misunderstanding you, it's perfectly > >> possible. Here's a link to an emal from just last week about > >> someone doing that: > >> http://lists-archives.org/debian-user/3509138-imap-is-teh-r0x0rz.html > > > > Maybe I am just misunderstanding you or the ramifications, but I > > only have a residential ISP package with a dynamic IP and the only > > domain pointing towards it is free from DynDNS. I don't find myself > > in the situation to run a complete mail package like what Gmail and > > others provide. > > I'm certain that you *are* running a "complete mail package" and > don't even know it! :O > > Just about all Unix systems use the same MTA[0] to transfer intra- > system mail as they do to transfer mail across the world. Exim is > the Debian default, but many replace it with Postfix. > > Most people must configure their MUA to send email to > smtp.bigisp.net, and receive mail from pop.bigisp.net. But with > Unix (and Debian makes this very easy) you can configure your MTA to > be a relayhost[1]. > > The way I've configured my system. Thus, in Icedove, I don't set > the smtp server to be smtp.east.cox.net but "haggis", which is my > machine's name. The MTA (Postfix, in my case) then routes the email > to smtp.east.cox.net which then takes it and sends it on to it's > final destination. > > Conversely, fetchmail retrieves my mail from pop.east.cox.net then > passes it to Postfix (which feeds it thru Spam Assassin) and then to > an IMAP server running on my desktop. That's where I (and my wife > and children) read our email from, anywhere on our LAN. > > [0]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_transfer_agent > [1]http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html#relayhost not how they interacted with other POP and SMTP servers. After reading your message, I think it's finally coming together now. :P Would this also be possible using Gmail's servers? As I see it, using your ISP's email address would be a pain if you ever had to change ISPs. -- Brian |
|
|
Re: [OT] GMail troubles [Was: Re: du-guidelines - point 7]On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 23:16:29 -0500, Ron Johnson (ron.l.johnson@...) wrote:
> I'm certain that you *are* running a "complete mail package" and > don't even know it! :O > > Just about all Unix systems use the same MTA[0] to transfer intra- > system mail as they do to transfer mail across the world. Exim is > the Debian default, but many replace it with Postfix. > > Most people must configure their MUA to send email to > smtp.bigisp.net, and receive mail from pop.bigisp.net. But with > Unix (and Debian makes this very easy) you can configure your MTA to > be a relayhost[1]. > > The way I've configured my system. Thus, in Icedove, I don't set > the smtp server to be smtp.east.cox.net but "haggis", which is my > machine's name. The MTA (Postfix, in my case) then routes the email > to smtp.east.cox.net which then takes it and sends it on to it's > final destination. > > Conversely, fetchmail retrieves my mail from pop.east.cox.net then > passes it to Postfix (which feeds it thru Spam Assassin) and then to > an IMAP server running on my desktop. That's where I (and my wife > and children) read our email from, anywhere on our LAN. Yes, I have used Postfix on my main home server for years now and it is really pretty much zero maintenance. Because I am fortunate enough to have a static IP address from my (consumer) ISP, (which is also thoughtful enough to allow setting of valid rDNS) I send and receive mail direct-to-mx from my Postfix box here. It means most unwanted stuff is *rejected* at the SMTP envelope stage with some pretty simple Postfix rules, rather than having to be accepted before being filtered by Spamassassin or whatever. -- Bob Cox. Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK. Registered user #445000 with the Linux Counter - http://counter.li.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: [OT] GMail troubles [Was: Re: du-guidelines - point 7]On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:23:10 +0300
Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@...> wrote: Hello Andrei, > If I go to the webinterface I am requested to pass a captcha test. > This is getting pretty annoying! If you don't use the web i/f at GMail, they "do things"(0) to your account. Using the web interface once a week negates any adverse effect. Like Ron, I'm no fan of Gmail. (0) Stopping POP/IMAP access is one of them. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" An old custom to sell your daughter Hong Kong Garden - Siouxsie & The Banshees |
|
|
Re: [OT] GMail troubles [Was: Re: du-guidelines - point 7]On Mon,14.Jul.08, 20:46:07, Ron Johnson wrote:
> If you care about your data, and want to get to it at any time, keep > your data and your apps on your local machine. I don't keep any data on gmail servers. I use it mainly for posting. Only a limited amount of mail goes through their servers because this is the address I currently post everywhere. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) |
|
|
Re: [OT] GMail troubles [Was: Re: du-guidelines - point 7] |