|
View:
New views
7 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
apache::asp maintenanceHi list!
I was interested to know what is the apache::asp maintenance status? Is it still maintained?Is it dead? I have some applications here written in apache::asp and killing it ,for now ,is not an option.So ,are there people, except me, that are interested in the module?Are there people out there using this and maintaining it? Evgeny |
|
|
Re: apache::asp maintenanceTsirkin Evgeny wrote:
> I was interested to know what is the apache::asp maintenance status? > Is it still maintained?Is it dead? > I have some applications here written in apache::asp and killing it ,for > now ,is not > an option.So ,are there people, except me, that are interested in the > module?Are there > people out there using this and maintaining it? Well, on the one hand, the last update to the library was over two years ago, and the last post by its primary author was nearly a year and a half ago. On the other hand, I'm not aware of anything so badly wrong with it that we need someone to step in and take over. I think there are enough people using the library that it'd be valuable to see some new development, but I don't think the library is in danger of becoming irrelevant just yet. It still works, and it's still useful as it is. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: asp-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: asp-help@... |
|
|
Re: apache::asp maintenanceOn 6/19/07, Warren Young <warren@...> wrote: On the other hand, I'm not aware of anything so badly wrong with it that Good to know . Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
Re: apache::asp maintenanceTsirkin Evgeny wrote:
> > > On 6/19/07, *Warren Young* <warren@... > <mailto:warren@...>> wrote: > > On the other hand, I'm not aware of anything so badly wrong with it that > we need someone to step in and take over. I think there are enough > people using the library that it'd be valuable to see some new > development, but I don't think the library is in danger of becoming > irrelevant just yet. It still works, and it's still useful as it is. > > > Good to know . > Thanks. > Thanks Warren. I plan to push another release in the next couple of weeks as the software does need updating, in particular for it to work well with the latest mod_perl 2 release. If you have other needs please let me know. Josh --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: asp-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: asp-help@... |
|
|
Re: apache::asp maintenanceThose are great news!
Thanks Josh. Evgeny On 6/25/07, Joshua Chamas <josh@...> wrote: > Tsirkin Evgeny wrote: > > > > > > On 6/19/07, *Warren Young* <warren@... > > <mailto:warren@...>> wrote: > > > > On the other hand, I'm not aware of anything so badly wrong with it that > > we need someone to step in and take over. I think there are enough > > people using the library that it'd be valuable to see some new > > development, but I don't think the library is in danger of becoming > > irrelevant just yet. It still works, and it's still useful as it is. > > > > > > Good to know . > > Thanks. > > > > Thanks Warren. > > I plan to push another release in the next couple of weeks as the software > does need updating, in particular for it to work well with the latest mod_perl 2 > release. If you have other needs please let me know. > > Josh > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: asp-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: asp-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: asp-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: asp-help@... |
|
|
Re: apache::asp maintenanceJoshua Chamas wrote:
> If you have other needs please let me know. Well, for inertia reasons, we're still maintaining a lot of CentOS 3 and Red Hat Linux 9 type systems, with mod_perls of 1.99_07 and _09 vintage, which was before the big Apache2:: namespace reorg. As a result, when installing Apache::ASP, I have to manually edit ApacheCommon.pm to remove all the '2's. Also, the Apache2::ServerRec module doesn't exist on these systems, so I have to comment it out. Apache::ASP then works just fine. It would be spiffy if the library detected this situation and coped automatically. I tested this, and it works here: eval { # Try new Apache2 module requests first require Apache2::RequestRec; require Apache2::RequestUtil; require Apache2::RequestIO; require Apache2::Response; require APR::Table; require APR::Pool; require Apache2::Connection; require Apache2::ServerUtil; require Apache2::ServerRec; require Apache2::SubRequest; require Apache2::Log; }; eval { # Alternative if above fails because system is old, but not # so old that it's incompatible. require Apache::RequestRec; require Apache::RequestUtil; require Apache::RequestIO; require Apache::Response; require APR::Table; require APR::Pool; require Apache::Connection; require Apache::ServerUtil; require Apache::SubRequest; require Apache::Log; } if defined $@; --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: asp-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: asp-help@... |
|
|
Re: apache::asp maintenanceJoshua Chamas wrote:
> > I plan to push another release in the next couple of weeks Did you mean to type "months"? >:) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: asp-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: asp-help@... |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |