Much of my vocational aptitude and method, which I had thought to be learned habits, is more directly related to inborn personality and spiritual gifting. Some things I thought I learned – e.g. administration, leadership, writing/teaching – are spiritual gifts that God has plugged into a personality hard-wired to use them. Some personal traits I thought were odd – e.g. quickly systematizing new concepts, making application and then moving on to the next “thing on the list” – are, in fact, perfectly suited to and ingrained in both my gifts and personality. That also means that the downside of these traits – e.g. not taking the time to develop depth, a tendency to leave details unfinished – are just as deeply rooted and will take constant vigilance to mitigate.
I have a clearer understanding why some parts of ministry feel very natural and some have proven disconcerting – even to the point of failure. I can see that I have made some ministry choices based more on my picture of me in ministry, which used less of my natural and spiritual wiring, than on God’s picture. There are points at which no amount of education, effort or even desire will overcome what God did not wire or rewire me (and therefore “want me”) to do.
Following the Foundations retreat, I also have a growing realization that what I qualitatively perceive to be God’s calling on my life (“what I feel could be”) should be tempered with the quantitative information from the investigative process concerning “what actually is”. While I draw the line at using any qualitative measure such as a learning styles diagnostic test to put God’s will in a box (after all, “what is” is finally what God says it is), the qualitative results are helping me get a fresh perspective on past experiences and a better framework for future opportunities.
G. Kevin Roper, MBA