|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Things we talked about at YapcNA 08Hello everyone,
My name is Leonard Miller (olegm on irc), and I gave a beginner's talk on CGI::APP in Chicago, and I learned in at the CGI::App BOF, that there were a number of things we needed/wanted to change about CGI::App. While I am new to the project and this team, it felt that as a group, some direction was needed, and some decisions needed to be made. I am writing this, to prompt discussion for the direction and decisions. One of the things we talked was to create a startup script similar to Catalyst, that will get you working quickly with CGI::App. Along with that, we were looking to create a bundle/package that would hold all that CGI::App needs for a new installation. I know that there was conversation on the listserv about Module::Starter::Plugin::CGIApp, and I wanted to make sure that the concerns of those who wanted the starter script were addressed. The last the we came up with was to come up with a new/better name. I have several names although they are not all mine, I would like to post them here and start some discussion: Spark Titanium Stimulus Synergy SWAP - Simple Web Application Platform SWAF - ... Framework Thank you for listening, please let me know what you think on these issues. I will be away from the keyboard for the next two days, so I will hear all your comments on Sunday. Leonard ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ |
|
|
Re: Things we talked about at YapcNA 08Hi Leonard,
This effort sounds very similar to the CGI::Application::Framework (CAF, occasionally we'd call it "caffeine") module that Michael Graham and I released in 2005. We maintained it for a few months afterwards but not since since -- I'm a manager myself these days and barely code, and he's not in a position where he can release software to the larger world. Still, you might be interested in reviewing it and seeing what lessons you can learn from it. Cheers, - Richard On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Leonard Miller <leonard@...> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > My name is Leonard Miller (olegm on irc), and I gave a beginner's talk on > CGI::APP in Chicago, and I learned in at the CGI::App BOF, that there were a > number of things we needed/wanted to change about CGI::App. > > While I am new to the project and this team, it felt that as a group, some > direction was needed, and some decisions needed to be made. I am writing > this, to prompt discussion for the direction and decisions. > > One of the things we talked was to create a startup script similar to > Catalyst, that will get you working quickly with CGI::App. Along with that, > we were looking to create a bundle/package that would hold all that CGI::App > needs for a new installation. > > I know that there was conversation on the listserv about > Module::Starter::Plugin::CGIApp, and I wanted to make sure that the concerns > of those who wanted the starter script were addressed. > > The last the we came up with was to come up with a new/better name. I have > several names although they are not all mine, I would like to post them here > and start some discussion: > Spark > Titanium > Stimulus > Synergy > SWAP - Simple Web Application Platform > SWAF - ... Framework > > > Thank you for listening, please let me know what you think on these issues. > I will be away from the keyboard for the next two days, so I will hear all > your comments on Sunday. > > Leonard > > ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ > ## ## > ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## > ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## > ## ## > ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## > ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## > ## ## > ################################################################ > > ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ |
|
|
Re: Things we talked about at YapcNA 08Leonard Miller wrote:
> Hello everyone, > > My name is Leonard Miller (olegm on irc), and I gave a beginner's talk > on CGI::APP in Chicago, and I learned in at the CGI::App BOF, that there > were a number of things we needed/wanted to change about CGI::App. > > While I am new to the project and this team, it felt that as a group, > some direction was needed, and some decisions needed to be made. I am > writing this, to prompt discussion for the direction and decisions. > > One of the things we talked was to create a startup script similar to > Catalyst, that will get you working quickly with CGI::App. Along with > that, we were looking to create a bundle/package that would hold all > that CGI::App needs for a new installation. > > I know that there was conversation on the listserv about > Module::Starter::Plugin::CGIApp, and I wanted to make sure that the > concerns of those who wanted the starter script were addressed. > > The last the we came up with was to come up with a new/better name. I > have several names although they are not all mine, I would like to post > them here and start some discussion: > Spark > Titanium > Stimulus > Synergy > SWAP - Simple Web Application Platform > SWAF - ... Framework > > How about "Mojo". Short easy to say...and a cool word. Robert ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ |
|
|
Re: Re: Things we talked about at YapcNA 08R. Hicks wrote:
> Leonard Miller wrote: >> The last the we came up with was to come up with a new/better name. I >> have several names although they are not all mine, I would like to post >> them here and start some discussion: >> Spark >> Titanium >> Stimulus >> Synergy >> SWAP - Simple Web Application Platform >> SWAF - ... Framework >> >> > > How about "Mojo". Short easy to say...and a cool word. Because: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MojoMojo/ ;-) Rhesa ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ |
|
|
Re: Things we talked about at YapcNA 08Rhesa Rozendaal wrote:
> R. Hicks wrote: >> Leonard Miller wrote: >>> The last the we came up with was to come up with a new/better name. I >>> have several names although they are not all mine, I would like to >>> post them here and start some discussion: >>> Spark >>> Titanium >>> Stimulus >>> Synergy >>> SWAP - Simple Web Application Platform >>> SWAF - ... Framework >>> >>> >> >> How about "Mojo". Short easy to say...and a cool word. > > Because: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MojoMojo/ ;-) > > > Rhesa Totally different...but I see the point. Robert ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ |
|
|
Re: Things we talked about at YapcNA 08: (Titanium progress report)> The last the we came up with was to come up with a new/better name. I > have several names although they are not all mine, I would like to post > them here and start some discussion: > Spark > Titanium I made good progress on Titanium, but then completely lost momentum about a week after the conference. However, there's enough done that it could be useful to publish my progress, I just don't feel great about publishing something that's not as polished as I wanted. Titanium is a sub-class of CGI::Application that bundles several useful, popular plugins by default, but has little to no code of it's own. As part of providing a better user experience, the documentation from CGI::Application was copied and overhauled as well. This included documenting some key plugin features directly (since Titanium provides them directly), and also omitting some parts of CGI::Application that are advanced or unnecessary for common cases. For example, it omits how to write a plugin using callbacks, and documents using $c->redirect(), but not $c->header_type('redirect'). Those docs are not disappearing, they are just in the more advanced/technical CGI::Application module, and not in the more user-friendly Titanium module. I would also like to take the user-friendliness further and bundle the "starter" script, and ideally even be able to ship Titanium with all it's dependencies, so you can just unpack it in a directory and start hacking. Because Titanium makes several more decisions and recommendations about plugins to use, some new users will be happy that it's easier to get started with, but some existing users will surely disagree that whatever plugin is loaded by default. To address that, the documentation would describe how we might use a "Titanium::Alloy::" name space, so other people might publish sister modules, which take the same approach, but bundle different sets of plugins by default. Unlike "forks", CGI::Application plugins would continue to be shared between all of these projects. Finally, people who have already developed a custom sub-class that they re-use can continue to use CGI::Application, and plugins will compatible with them as well. A big part of my loss is momentum is that I don't need Titanium myself because I already have a custom sub-class of CGI::App that works well. The reason to build it is because I believe it's a good way to build quality software easily, and I think it would help speed up development for some people. I think my reality is that even if I am able to follow-through on launching v1.0, I'm not sure I have the energy to continue to lead it where I want to see it going in terms of all-around ease of use and packaging. If other people share this vision, perhaps we can accomplish it together. Mark -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mark Stosberg Principal Developer mark@... Summersault, LLC 765-939-9301 ext 202 database driven websites . . . . . http://www.summersault.com/ . . . . . . . . ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |