|

»

»

»

Test report for Xen-3.2.2-rc4 (#16984)

View: New views

3 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	Test report for Xen-3.2.2-rc4 (#16984) by Li, Haicheng :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message All, This is our test report for Xen-3.2.2-rc4 (#16984). One new bug was found, and old bug #1313 got fixed. New Issue: ============================================== 1. with qcow image, it's failed to save/restore a hvm guest with cdrom. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1344 Fixed Issue: ============================================== 1. [Xen-3.2.2-rc1] with qcow image, saved domain can not be restored on 32E. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Testing Environment: ============================================== PAE CPU : Xeon(r) processor 5300 series Dom0 OS : RHEL5.1 Memory size : 8G IA32E CPU : Xeon(r) processor 5300 series Dom0 OS : RHEL5 Memory size : 8G Details: ============================================== Platform : PAE Service OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga) Hardware : Clovertown Xen package: Xen-3.2.2-RC4 16984 Summary Test Report of Last Session ===================================================================== Total Pass Fail NoResult Crash ===================================================================== vtd 5 2 2 0 1 device_model 2 2 0 0 0 control_panel 15 11 4 0 0 Restart 2 2 0 0 0 gtest 24 24 0 0 0 ===================================================================== vtd 5 2 2 0 1 :two_dev_up_xp_nomsi_PAE 1 0 0 0 1 :two_dev_smp_xp_nomsi_PA 1 1 0 0 0 :two_dev_smp_nomsi_PAE_g 1 0 1 0 0 :two_dev_scp_nomsi_PAE_g 1 1 0 0 0 :two_dev_up_nomsi_PAE_gP 1 0 1 0 0 device_model 2 2 0 0 0 :pv_on_up_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :pv_on_smp_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 control_panel 15 11 4 0 0 :XEN_4G_guest_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_four_vmx_xenu_seq_P 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_four_dguest_co_PAE_ 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_linux_win_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_SR_SMP_PAE_gPAE 1 0 1 0 0 :XEN_Nevada_xenu_PAE_gPA 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_LM_SMP_PAE_gPAE 1 0 1 0 0 :XEN_SR_Continuity_PAE_g 1 0 1 0 0 :XEN_vmx_vcpu_pin_PAE_gP 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_two_winxp_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_LM_Continuity_PAE_g 1 0 1 0 0 :XEN_256M_guest_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_1500M_guest_PAE_gPA 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_vmx_2vcpu_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_four_sguest_seq_PAE 1 1 0 0 0 Restart 2 2 0 0 0 :GuestPAE_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :SolarisPAE_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 gtest 24 24 0 0 0 :boot_up_acpi_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :ltp_nightly_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_acpi_xp_PAE_gPA 1 1 0 0 0 :reboot_xp_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_vista_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_fc9_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_acpi_win2k3_PAE 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_smp_acpi_win2k3_PA 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_smp_acpi_win2k_PAE 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_acpi_win2k_PAE_ 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_smp_acpi_xp_PAE_gP 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_noacpi_win2k_PA 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_smp_vista_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_noacpi_win2k3_P 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_nevada_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_indiana_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_rhel5u1_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_base_kernel_PAE_gP 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_win2008_PAE_gPA 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_noacpi_xp_PAE_g 1 1 0 0 0 :bootx_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :reboot_fc6_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_smp_win2008_PAE_gP 1 1 0 0 0 :kb_nightly_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 ===================================================================== Total 49 42 6 0 1 Platform : x86_64 Service OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5 (Tikanga) Hardware : Clovertown Xen package: Xen-3.2.2-RC4 16984 Summary Test Report of Last Session ===================================================================== Total Pass Fail NoResult Crash ===================================================================== vtd 5 5 0 0 0 device_model 2 2 0 0 0 control_panel 20 15 5 0 0 gtest 21 21 0 0 0 ===================================================================== vtd 5 5 0 0 0 :two_dev_up_xp_nomsi_64_ 1 1 0 0 0 :two_dev_smp_nomsi_64_g3 1 1 0 0 0 :two_dev_scp_nomsi_64_g3 1 1 0 0 0 :two_dev_up_nomsi_64_g32 1 1 0 0 0 :two_dev_smp_xp_nomsi_64 1 1 0 0 0 device_model 2 2 0 0 0 :pv_on_up_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :pv_on_smp_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 control_panel 20 15 5 0 0 :XEN_1500M_guest_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_4G_guest_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_LM_Continuity_64_g3 1 0 1 0 0 :XEN_256M_xenu_64_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_four_vmx_xenu_seq_6 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_vmx_vcpu_pin_64_g32 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_SR_Continuity_64_g3 1 0 1 0 0 :XEN_linux_win_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_vmx_2vcpu_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_four_dguest_co_64_g 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_1500M_guest_64_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_two_winxp_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_4G_guest_64_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_four_sguest_seq_64_ 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_256M_guest_64_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_LM_SMP_64_g32e 1 0 1 0 0 :XEN_Nevada_xenu_64_g32e 1 0 1 0 0 :XEN_256M_guest_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :XEN_SR_SMP_64_g32e 1 0 1 0 0 :XEN_four_sguest_seq_64_ 1 1 0 0 0 gtest 21 21 0 0 0 :boot_up_acpi_win2k_64_g 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_noacpi_win2k_64 1 1 0 0 0 :reboot_xp_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :bootx_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_vista_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_acpi_xp_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_smp_acpi_xp_64_g32 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_acpi_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_base_kernel_64_g32 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_win2008_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :kb_nightly_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_up_acpi_win2k3_64_ 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_nevada_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_smp_vista_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :ltp_nightly_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_fc9_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_smp_win2008_64_g32 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_smp_acpi_win2k3_64 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_rhel5u1_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :reboot_fc6_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0 :boot_smp_acpi_win2k_64_ 1 1 0 0 0 ===================================================================== Total 49 44 5 0 0 -- haicheng _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@... http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
	Re: Test report for Xen-3.2.2-rc4 (#16984) by Keir Fraser-3 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On 5/9/08 15:26, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@...> wrote: > All, > > This is our test report for Xen-3.2.2-rc4 (#16984). One new bug was found, and > old bug #1313 got fixed. > > New Issue: > ============================================== > 1. with qcow image, it's failed to save/restore a hvm guest with cdrom. > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1344 The new tip of xen-3.2-testing (changeset 16985) is a patch from Intel presumably to fix this very issue. It would be good if you could test that changeset (I may not bother to do another release candidate) and we will release next week if it tests as all okay for you, and we get no other bad reports. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@... http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
	RE: Test report for Xen-3.2.2-rc4 (#16984) by Li, Haicheng :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Keir Fraser wrote: > On 5/9/08 15:26, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@...> wrote: > >> All, >> >> This is our test report for Xen-3.2.2-rc4 (#16984). One new bug was >> found, and old bug #1313 got fixed. >> >> New Issue: >> ============================================== >> 1. with qcow image, it's failed to save/restore a hvm guest with >> cdrom. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1344 > > The new tip of xen-3.2-testing (changeset 16985) is a patch from Intel > presumably to fix this very issue. It would be good if you could test > that changeset (I may not bother to do another release candidate) and > we will release next week if it tests as all okay for you, and we get > no other bad reports. > > -- Keir Keir, it is fixed by c/s 16985. So all of our cases can get pass now. thanks. -- haicheng _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@... http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

LightInTheBox - Buy quality products at wholesale price!