|
View:
New views
1 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
TR: OpenID in India - What stops you from using OpenID?Oh yes ! the link is www.proto.in “Pronto” mean “Allo” in Italian! :) Thanks -Snorri De : Jeetendra
Mirchandani [mailto:jeetum@...] Hey Snorri, that should have
been proto.in, not pronto.in On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Snorri
<snorri@...> wrote: Interesting comments
Eddy, I copy also here the
answer of Vijay Anand, the founder of www.pronto.in It's a platform with
important Indian start-ups: Who can answer? Thanks -Snorri Rajan represents a firm that works in the secure identity
space. When asked how it measures with OpenID, he mentioned a few remarks. I
wanted to run it through you to get your feedback. What do you think? For Point 4 Open ID – Open id is a
good concept, but very much different to XeQure. We have taken into
consideration the shortcomings of Open ID in development of XeQure. Please
visit http://idcorner.org/2007/08/22/the-problems-with-openid/
to get an idea where Open ID stops being user friendly and secure.
Few salient points are as below: 1) Prone to phishing – Open ID
workflow and architecture is such that it is easy to phish into as any person
can create a website and become an Open ID provider. Causing a great threat to
user security and hence confidence in application. If you use one OpenID
account to go to two hundred sites, the thief who steals your OpenID
credentials gains access to any of the 200 sites. 2) Privacy issue – With open
ID the identity provider can track all your login and usage history. This in
itself is a grave concern for internet users. XeQure architecture is different
and it does not control the way user moves on a third party website. 3) No Patent –Open ID is a
free framework (without any patent ), which can be implemented by anyone (even
hackers and phishers), this makes it very vulnerable for hackers and users tend
to have limited trust in such applications. No wonder the user base is still
very low for it. 4) Usability issues – Open Id
is too cumbersome to use. It has three entities the user, Identity provider
e.g. Claim ID, and Consumer e.g. LiveJournal.com, pbwiki.com, etc. They all have to synchronize to make this
functional. Too many parties involved for user ease. It has many steps on each
login and it is not a true single click sign on unlike XeQure. This Open ID
framework needs to be implemented for each website which requires time and cost
to be incurred to do so. 5) Multiple user account login
– What if user has multiple accounts to say Google. He/she will still have to
remember all the URIs to login to different accounts. Open ID falls short of a
true SSO(Single sign on) to all user accounts. 6)
6) Limited operation in major players – Open ID is not being
provided as a login method on major websites like Gmail, Orkut, Myspace, etc.
Although majors like Google, Microsoft, etc. expressed their willingness
to provide support for Open ID more than 6 months back, but have done nothing
to make it functional as of yet. It seems that OpenID will take a very long
time to be used as a standard on the World Wide Web. De : general-bounces@... [mailto:general-bounces@...]
De la part de Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) Jeetendra Mirchandani: This is a question for all those website owners in India, who
have been around for a while, and those who have started new ventures recently.
Let me list down possible reasons I can think of, as if I were to own a website
targeted towards Indians
With the same argument, point 4 is also not totally valid!
A user understands who to trust, and build up that trust over time. With big
players like Yahoo providing OpenID, I think this
barrier is gone.
And if you say OpenID implementation is complicated, you
need to look around. The developers section on openid.net could be a good starting point.
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general |
||||||||||||||
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |