Succesful and smooth install of Lenny Beta2 on AS DS20

View: New views
2 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Succesful and smooth install of Lenny Beta2 on AS DS20

by Gianluca Bonetti :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hello everybody!

At last, I managed to put my "new" DS20 at office, in a place where I
can put it online every time I want, and also let it work 24x7 if
needed (thanks to a nice 2000 VA MGE UPS donated by a friend).

The install run smooth.

I haven't noticed any problem at all.

As I put everything on XFS filesystems, there is need of a separate /
boot.
The installer complains that the /boot should be on ext2 fs, but I
thought that an ext3 partition works good too (I use /boot on ext3 on a
PWS)

Debian packages are in good shape.
I can also install and boot 2.6.26 SMP alpha kernel, while I cannot do
the same on i386 (freezes both on my dual core Xeon Proliant ML110 at
work and on my Dual Core Acer Aspire at home)
I was surprised that it works on Alpha and still not fixed on i386,
since I expected to be the contrary.

I am also quite scared to be able to see the output of "java -version"
report to be a shiny up to date 1.6.0.
Even if interpreted mode, it is still a great goal.
The best Java machine ever on Alpha was the Compaq made... 1.3?

I should say that the status of the Alpha port is not in so bad
condition as someone fears to be.
I know that there is still much work to do on it, but the quality of
the Lenny release on alpha is at the same level as for the i386 one.
That is a great result, guys!

Apart from this nice experience with the new installer on Alpha, I
would like to help someway.
The dual EV67 DS20 would be bored to stay offline all the day. :)

What can I do to help?

Is there a "to do list" page somewhere on the net?

Best regards
gl


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...


Re: Succesful and smooth install of Lenny Beta2 on AS DS20

by Steve Langasek :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 01:37:32PM +0200, Gianluca Bonetti wrote:
> As I put everything on XFS filesystems, there is need of a separate /
> boot.
> The installer complains that the /boot should be on ext2 fs, but I
> thought that an ext3 partition works good too (I use /boot on ext3 on a
> PWS)

Experience shows that aboot has problems with directory traversal on ext3
filesystems.  If you have a separate /boot filesystem with the kernels in
the top-level directory, ext3 *does* work; but if your root fs is ext3 and
you don't have a separate /boot partition, it does not work.

Encoding this logic in the installer would have been a bit much; it was more
straightforward to always require ext2 on /boot, since the advantages of
ext3 over ext2 don't generally apply to /boot anyway.

> Is there a "to do list" page somewhere on the net?

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-alpha@...

--
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@...                                     vorlon@...


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

LightInTheBox - Buy quality products at wholesale price!