|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Samba v2.2.12 NTLM versions?>Isn't gcc available for your system?
No, I'm 99% sure there isn't a gcc on MP-RAS. I've looked at building gcc as well, but then run into more problems with that; config.guess fails trying to run a utility that doesn't exist. Can you point me at the code in Samba 3 that does the ntlmv2 encryption? Maybe I can patch this into the v2 code? Any other suggestions? Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba |
|
|
Re: Samba v2.2.12 NTLM versions?On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:01:09AM +0100, PhilH wrote:
> Can you point me at the code in Samba 3 that does the ntlmv2 > encryption? Maybe I can patch this into the v2 code? In 3.2 most of the cryto routines are in the files libsmb/ntlmssp.c and libsmb/smbencrypt.c. What is it that your compiler breaks over? Maybe it might be easier to fix those for your environment that pushing modern crypto into 2.2. For example the named initializers should quite easily be revertable for you. Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Samba v2.2.12 NTLM versions?On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 03:41:36PM -0400, Horder, Philip wrote:
> >I'm not aware that we actually depend on those. > Needed to patch Makefile to set "AWK=nawk" > > >If you have autotools around, you might want to comment out... > No such luck. So I went for it. The following is the result. As you can > see it didn't get very far, and I don't understand why. For some reason, > Make complains that I haven't run configure, and also complains about > "hostname: not found". Then it completely dies trying to compile > dynconfig.h. I've looked at most of these errors & warnings, and can't > find a single thing wrong with the source code at the lines mentioned. > It looks like there is still some configuration stuff missing, but I > don't know what. Here's the compiler output. Any suggestions, 'cos this > is looking pretty hopeless to me, as I haven't even got to the c99 > initialiser errors yet?! phil. then. Sorry for pointing you at this... Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba |
|
|
RE: Samba v2.2.12 NTLM versions?> Well, without good C knowledge you're probably a bit lost then
Apart from the software engineering degree, 18 years in the industry, and 10 years C & C++ experience. It seems that what I'm lacking here is experience with the oh-so-clever configuration scripts used by the Samba build system. Thanks for your time Volker, but I'm going to have to give up, as I can't afford to spend weeks picking through the source and header hierarchies. phil -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba |
|
|
Re: Samba v2.2.12 NTLM versions?On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 05:46:57AM -0400, Horder, Philip wrote:
> > Well, without good C knowledge you're probably a bit lost then > > Apart from the software engineering degree, 18 years in > the industry, and 10 years C & C++ experience. > It seems that what I'm lacking here is experience with the > oh-so-clever configuration scripts used by the Samba build > system. > > Thanks for your time Volker, but I'm going to have to give > up, as I can't afford to spend weeks picking through the > source and header hierarchies. giving you the hint to try Samba 3. I do believe that we can make Samba 3 run on almost every platform that is Posixy, but it takes time going through the indiviual compile problems. Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |