Nabble - Red5

Re: Re d5 admin / object inspector project now online

2008-10-13T10:25:28Z

This looks very interesting, I'll have to check it out.

Paul

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Gallo_Teo <lanzi.matteo@...> wrote:

Hi people, I just uploaded red5 Admin Flex client tool.
It is a complete open source project to help developers to debug their Red5
applications
it is written in flex with cairngorm.

http://code.google.com/p/red5admin/

the current features are

* List Application instances
* List Shared Object in scope
* Inspect Shared Object properties
o List Arrays
o List custom Object
o List primitive types
* Stream inspector
o list available recorded streams
o list live streams
o stream preview
o enum client connected to the stream

this is an alpha version, if you consider it useful, I'll work on to add
features.
please give me a feed back

thanks
Matteo Lanzi

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Red5-admin---object-inspector-project-now-online-tp19958980p19958980.html
Sent from the Red5 - English mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
http://gregoire.org/
http://osflash.org/red5

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Red5 admin / object inspector project now online

2008-10-13T10:15:53Z

Hi people, I just uploaded red5 Admin Flex client tool.
It is a complete open source project to help developers to debug their Red5 applications
it is written in flex with cairngorm.

http://code.google.com/p/red5admin/

the current features are

* List Application instances
* List Shared Object in scope
* Inspect Shared Object properties
o List Arrays
o List custom Object
o List primitive types
* Stream inspector
o list available recorded streams
o list live streams
o stream preview
o enum client connected to the stream

this is an alpha version, if you consider it useful, I'll work on to add features.
please give me a feed back

thanks
Matteo Lanzi

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: Cannot use red5 because of "due to long handshake" errors

2008-10-13T09:48:49Z

It must have been the Gremlins.. :)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:56 AM, mark <clunymark@...> wrote:

Dominick Accattato wrote:
> ok if it's working now, then I have another questions.
>
> did you stop the server after the install on demand and then start the
> server? If so, then it might have downloaded correctly and just
> didn't startup correctly.

No, I did not restart the server.

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
http://gregoire.org/
http://osflash.org/red5

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: Admin application asks me to install Flash - but it is installed....

2008-10-13T09:13:21Z

mark wrote:

> I wanted to try out the admin application, connected to
> http://localhost:5080/admin, entered a username and password to
> register, and:
> The thing thinks that there is no Flash installed, although I have Flash
> 9.0.124.0 installed. I tried to remove the "Flash Checker" code, but
> could not find where it lives. The index.jsp file in the admin folder is
> sane and simple.
>
>
>

I got it fixed by simply using the direct URL to the swf
http://localhost:5080/demos/adminPanel.swf
And I found adminPanel.html as the source of the trouble. It loads the
"No Flash" message in the body - regardless of the actual browser status.

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: How to Download org.red5.server.net.rtmp.RTMPClient.INetStreamEventHandler

2008-10-13T09:10:11Z

fyi there is a source directory called [src] which holds the entire red5
java structure. Tbh when you type 'ant jar' it builds the red5.jar from that
directory.

see ./src/org.red5.server.net/rtmp/....

To download Red5 code from SVN please check this page:
http://osflash.org/red5/projectinfo

----- Original Message -----
From: "wastiee" <wastiee_wen@...>
Subject: [Red5] How to Download
org.red5.server.net.rtmp.RTMPClient.INetStreamEventHandler

>
> Hello everyone,
> i need this file How to Download
> org.red5.server.net.rtmp.RTMPClient.INetStreamEventHandler. can anyone
> help
> me to get this file.
> Thanks in advance
> wanstiee
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/How-to-Download-org.red5.server.net.rtmp.RTMPClient.INetStreamEventHandler-tp19957184p19957184.html
> Sent from the Red5 - English mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: Starting up Red5 on server Reboot

2008-10-13T09:05:46Z

hi you had been in the chat today? you should have waited 1 moment:)

http://88.152.22.77/Serendipity/

greetz Sascha

/red5/
server/Standalone
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.red5.server.Standalone
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:276)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:251)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:319)

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Admin application asks me to install Flash - but it is installed....

2008-10-13T09:05:09Z

I wanted to try out the admin application, connected to
http://localhost:5080/admin, entered a username and password to
register, and:
The thing thinks that there is no Flash installed, although I have Flash
9.0.124.0 installed. I tried to remove the "Flash Checker" code, but
could not find where it lives. The index.jsp file in the admin folder is
sane and simple.

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: Software tool to live broadcast video and audio from a videocam?

2008-10-13T09:01:56Z

Hey Jorge,

I'm working on a system that pulls from shoutcast tv and pushes out red5. No
E.T.A. yet. Also, pushing to shoutcast from red5 stream is being
experimented with.

You can stream with fme. Your team at perweb could also put together a .net
or java client to push a stream to red5. That may be the best option for you
this week.

Glad you are finally making the move. Is your stream service bigger than
your anti-virus department yet?

I stopped haning at winamp since the moderators turned into format
extremeists, and no longer interested in r-n-d.

Andy ( nsv 'majordude' smelter)

----- Original Message -----
From: <jmlt@...>
To: <red5@...>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 2:34 AM
Subject: [Red5] Software tool to live broadcast video and audio from a
videocam?

Hello,

At present I broadcast live video and audio from a videocam and a TV Tuner
using a ShoutCast server and the NSVtools that captures the filming and has
only 6 seconds delay in brodcasting. But there is problem, NSVtools is too
old (2003) since his author was hired by AOL and then quit out of the job.

NSVtools is too old for Windows Vista and sometimes is not stable with
Windows XP

http://forums.winamp.com/

Please check:

SHOUTcast TV / Nullsoft Video (topics)

So the great solution is supposed to be red5

I installed red5 in my Linux dedicated server and you can play the videos
and see they work stable and reliable:

http://www.perweb.tv

The question is:

Is there any application software to capture sound and video Tool in order
to live broadcst thru the Internet like:

1. NSVtools for ShoutCast server
2. Flash Media Encoder

Regards from Peru

Jorge Machado

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web LIVE - Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: Install Red5 Webroot

2008-10-13T08:50:19Z

ahhh also if i am more a windows dude... i think i see your problem... btw i dident downloaded your war file:)

oflaDemo can only save into a subfolder of its self, sounds to me like a standard file security behavior,
but i guess you would like to have a copy of the file into a folder reachable from your apache to provide a Download of the file..

i would choose to
1) wait until the record is finished and the file is saved into a subfolder of oflaDemo
2) i would may write something like

___________________________________________________

  private boolean copyfile(String fileName){

private String pathToSave = "myPath";//here comes the path to your desitination aka webroot

private String pathToLoad = "myPath";//here comes the path to your sourcefolder where your records got saved
private String srFile = pathToLoad + "" + fileName;
private String stFile = pathToSave + "" + fileName;



    try{

       File f1 = new File(srFile);

 
      File f2 = new File(

dtFile);



      InputStream in = new FileInputStream(f1);

 
      

      //For Append the file.

//      OutputStream out = new FileOutputStream(f2,true);



      //For Overwrite the file.

      //OutputStream out = new FileOutputStream(f2);

      //For dont overwrite an existing file

if ( f1.exists() && f1.canRead() && !f2.exists() && pathToSave.isDirectory()){


      OutputStream out = new FileOutputStream(f2);
} else {

// please remove this whe its working because its ugly and i even dont know if it makes sense because an io error would be catched

/**/
  System.out.println("could not copy file because:"
  
  System.out.println("File Name:" + f1.getName());
  System.out.println("Path:" + f1.getPath());
  System.out.println("Abs Path:" + f1.getAbsolutePath());

  System.out.println("Parent:" + f1.getParent());
  System.out.println(f1.exists() ? "exists" : "does not exist");
  System.out.println(f1.canWrite() ? "is writeable" : "is not writeable");

  System.out.println(f1.canRead() ? "is readable" : "is not readable");
  System.out.println("is a directory" + f1.isDirectory() );
  System.out.println(f1.isFile() ? "is normal file" : "might be a named pipe");

  System.out.println(f1.isAbsolute() ? "is absolute" : "is not absolute");
  System.out.println("File last modified:" + f1.lastModified());
  System.out.println("File size:" + f1.length() + " Bytes");


  System.out.println("File Name:" + f2.getName());
  System.out.println("Path:" + f2.getPath());
  System.out.println("Abs Path:" + f2.getAbsolutePath());
  System.out.println("Parent:" + f2.getParent());

  System.out.println(f2.exists() ? "exists" : "does not exist");
  System.out.println(f2.canWrite() ? "is writeable" : "is not writeable");
  System.out.println(f2.canRead() ? "is readable" : "is not readable");

  System.out.println("is a directory" + f2.isDirectory() );
  System.out.println(f2.isFile() ? "is normal file" : "might be a named pipe");
  System.out.println(f2.isAbsolute() ? "is absolute" : "is not absolute");

  System.out.println("File last modified:" + f2.lastModified());
  System.out.println("File size:" + f2.length() + " Bytes");
/**/
}


 

       byte[] buf = new byte[1024];


 
      int len;


      while ((len = in.read(buf)) > 0){

 
        out.write(buf, 0, len);

 
      }

       in.close();


      out.close();

       System.out.println("File copied.");
//now may delete the recorded file
//f1.delete();

//finaly return true.. to tell everything worked fine

return true;

     }

 
    catch(FileNotFoundException ex){


      System.out.println(ex.getMessage() + " in the specified directory.");

       System.exit(0);

     }


    catch(IOException e){

 
      System.out.println(e.getMessage());      

     }

   }

_____________________________________________________________________
call with:

System.out.println(" file copied : " + copyfile(randomFileName);
________________________________________________________________________________

i reWrote this example here a little bit: http://www.roseindia.net/java/beginners/CopyFile.shtml

hope that helps you

greetz
Sascha

2008/10/13 abshirf2 <abshirf2@...>

OS: Fedora Core 7, a VPS from a hosting company for testing
Java: 1.6
Red5 Standalone

I have red5 installed in this directory: /usr/local/red5 which is outside
the webroot. I have red5 running fine and oflaDemo (default) running fine.
However, I have tried countless times to edit oflaDemo so that it records in
my webroot. 2 Weeks of trying and I have only managed to get it to record to
a different directory in oflaDemo. I have followed lots of tutorials on how
to stream/record to different directories but I have been unsuccessful! I am
on the brink of depression! :P

This is my latest custom oflaDemo which is attached on the last post of this
thread: http://www.nabble.com/red5-plugin%3A-Logger-td19868646.html
http://www.nabble.com/red5-plugin%3A-Logger-td19868646.html
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Install-Red5-in-Webroot-tp19943869p19953437.html

Sent from the Red5 - English mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

How to Download org.red5.server.net.rtmp.RTMPClient.INetStreamEventHandler

2008-10-13T08:33:59Z

Hello everyone,
i need this file How to Download org.red5.server.net.rtmp.RTMPClient.INetStreamEventHandler. can anyone help me to get this file.
Thanks in advance
wanstiee

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: RTMPS and RTMPT bad performance

2008-10-13T08:04:09Z

Yep I already had RTMP bound on port 80 but it was not enough. That's why I was putting lots of hope in RTMPT :-).

Ignacio Lopez wrote:

Yes...try for example to call the camera.setQuality method passing 0 for quality and a low number for bandwith...let's say 9600

Regarding the firewall bypassing...there is no simple recipe. Maybe the firewall is filtering only "extrange" ports, so going with RTMP in the port 80 will do the trick. Other firewalls block not only ports but protocols as well, so there you 'd to rely on RTMPT to make the firewall believe that you are sending HTTP packets through port 80....but that's about it.....

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Dominick Accattato <daccattato@...> wrote:

true, RTMPT and RTMPS won't be as performant, but they should be working decently. Francos is saying he's getting "very" bad quality. Is that true Francos. Can you try to lower the quality and the size of you video to see if the choppiness goes away? You might be reaching the limit and thus experiencing bad quality.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Ignacio Lopez <ignacio.lopez@...> wrote:

Hey Francos, the thing you are experimenting is normal....RTMPT adds a http tunneling layer on top of regular RTMP, which means that every packet has to be manipulated to add/remove http headers....the same with RTMPS.
No pain, no gain :)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Francos <franccola@...> wrote:

Hello,

In order to bypass firewall, I try to use RTMPT and RTMPS for a small
conference application. However, I got very bad performance using the
both protocole (delay, audio cut etc...). Taking as hypothesis that it
was because of the port which would have less priority I tried to
establish them on port 80 and 1935. I got the same bad results.

Can anyone who know and understand these protocoles explain me shortly
why it doesn't work as good as RTMP ?

I was wondering in which way the ping_interval value had an influence on
the quality of the communication ?

Thank you for your answers,
Francos

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Dominick Accattato, CTO
Infrared5 Inc.
www.infrared5.com

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
  

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: Cannot use red5 because of "due to long handshake" errors

2008-10-13T07:56:26Z

Dominick Accattato wrote:
> ok if it's working now, then I have another questions.
>
> did you stop the server after the install on demand and then start the
> server? If so, then it might have downloaded correctly and just
> didn't startup correctly.
No, I did not restart the server.

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: RTMPS and RTMPT bad performance

2008-10-13T07:48:57Z

if you can, you should open up charles or some other http traffic software and record your traffic. We can then tell how much data is being sent and the delay. That might give us a better idea and something to compare to other results.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Francos <franccola@...> wrote:

Yes I confirm that the quality was very bad. Even with audio only (I was not publishing the video), it was the same.

I was doing these tests between two clients situated on two different continents. But RTMP is doing a great job I would have expected more from RTMPS and RTMPT.

Dominick Accattato wrote:
true, RTMPT and RTMPS won't be as performant, but they should be working decently. Francos is saying he's getting "very" bad quality. Is that true Francos. Can you try to lower the quality and the size of you video to see if the choppiness goes away? You might be reaching the limit and thus experiencing bad quality.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Ignacio Lopez <ignacio.lopez@...> wrote:

Hey Francos, the thing you are experimenting is normal....RTMPT adds a http tunneling layer on top of regular RTMP, which means that every packet has to be manipulated to add/remove http headers....the same with RTMPS.
No pain, no gain :)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Francos <franccola@...> wrote:

Hello,

In order to bypass firewall, I try to use RTMPT and RTMPS for a small
conference application. However, I got very bad performance using the
both protocole (delay, audio cut etc...). Taking as hypothesis that it
was because of the port which would have less priority I tried to
establish them on port 80 and 1935. I got the same bad results.

Can anyone who know and understand these protocoles explain me shortly
why it doesn't work as good as RTMP ?

I was wondering in which way the ping_interval value had an influence on
the quality of the communication ?

Thank you for your answers,
Francos

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Dominick Accattato, CTO
Infrared5 Inc.
www.infrared5.com
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
  
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Dominick Accattato, CTO
Infrared5 Inc.
www.infrared5.com

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: Cannot use red5 because of "due to long handshake" errors

2008-10-13T07:47:15Z

ok if it's working now, then I have another questions.

did you stop the server after the install on demand and then start the server? If so, then it might have downloaded correctly and just didn't startup correctly.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:36 AM, mark <clunymark@...> wrote:

Dominick Accattato wrote:
> So let me understand your workflow:
>
> * you start up red5
> * you install the soball example "on demand"
> * you open the example from the web interface
> * you try connecting
> * you get the "due to long handshake" error
>
> is that correct?

Hi Dominick,
yes, that's correct, but the problem seems to be solved now as it works.
I wonder if there was something wrong with the "on demand" installer. I
notice that it sometimes is not reacting or the actual download takes
long. I wonder if it would be good to have some kind of "installation in
progress" message or more detailed debug info like "connecting to...",
"downloading...", "installing".
anyway, it woks now.... :-) and thanks for your reply.

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Dominick Accattato, CTO
Infrared5 Inc.
www.infrared5.com

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: RTMPS and RTMPT bad performance

2008-10-13T07:43:24Z

Yes I confirm that the quality was very bad. Even with audio only (I was not publishing the video), it was the same.

I was doing these tests between two clients situated on two different continents. But RTMP is doing a great job I would have expected more from RTMPS and RTMPT.

Dominick Accattato wrote:

true, RTMPT and RTMPS won't be as performant, but they should be working decently. Francos is saying he's getting "very" bad quality. Is that true Francos. Can you try to lower the quality and the size of you video to see if the choppiness goes away? You might be reaching the limit and thus experiencing bad quality.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Ignacio Lopez <ignacio.lopez@...> wrote:

Hey Francos, the thing you are experimenting is normal....RTMPT adds a http tunneling layer on top of regular RTMP, which means that every packet has to be manipulated to add/remove http headers....the same with RTMPS.
No pain, no gain :)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Francos <franccola@...> wrote:

Hello,

In order to bypass firewall, I try to use RTMPT and RTMPS for a small
conference application. However, I got very bad performance using the
both protocole (delay, audio cut etc...). Taking as hypothesis that it
was because of the port which would have less priority I tried to
establish them on port 80 and 1935. I got the same bad results.

Can anyone who know and understand these protocoles explain me shortly
why it doesn't work as good as RTMP ?

I was wondering in which way the ping_interval value had an influence on
the quality of the communication ?

Thank you for your answers,
Francos

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Dominick Accattato, CTO
Infrared5 Inc.
www.infrared5.com
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
  

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: Cannot use red5 because of "due to long handshake" errors

2008-10-13T07:36:39Z

Dominick Accattato wrote:
> So let me understand your workflow:
>
> * you start up red5
> * you install the soball example "on demand"
> * you open the example from the web interface
> * you try connecting
> * you get the "due to long handshake" error
>
> is that correct?
Hi Dominick,
yes, that's correct, but the problem seems to be solved now as it works.
I wonder if there was something wrong with the "on demand" installer. I
notice that it sometimes is not reacting or the actual download takes
long. I wonder if it would be good to have some kind of "installation in
progress" message or more detailed debug info like "connecting to...",
"downloading...", "installing".
anyway, it woks now.... :-) and thanks for your reply.

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: RTMPS and RTMPT bad performance

2008-10-13T07:28:06Z

Yes...try for example to call the camera.setQuality method passing 0 for quality and a low number for bandwith...let's say 9600

Regarding the firewall bypassing...there is no simple recipe. Maybe the firewall is filtering only "extrange" ports, so going with RTMP in the port 80 will do the trick. Other firewalls block not only ports but protocols as well, so there you 'd to rely on RTMPT to make the firewall believe that you are sending HTTP packets through port 80....but that's about it.....

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Dominick Accattato <daccattato@...> wrote:

true, RTMPT and RTMPS won't be as performant, but they should be working decently. Francos is saying he's getting "very" bad quality. Is that true Francos. Can you try to lower the quality and the size of you video to see if the choppiness goes away? You might be reaching the limit and thus experiencing bad quality.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Ignacio Lopez <ignacio.lopez@...> wrote:

Hey Francos, the thing you are experimenting is normal....RTMPT adds a http tunneling layer on top of regular RTMP, which means that every packet has to be manipulated to add/remove http headers....the same with RTMPS.
No pain, no gain :)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Francos <franccola@...> wrote:

Hello,

In order to bypass firewall, I try to use RTMPT and RTMPS for a small
conference application. However, I got very bad performance using the
both protocole (delay, audio cut etc...). Taking as hypothesis that it
was because of the port which would have less priority I tried to
establish them on port 80 and 1935. I got the same bad results.

Can anyone who know and understand these protocoles explain me shortly
why it doesn't work as good as RTMP ?

I was wondering in which way the ping_interval value had an influence on
the quality of the communication ?

Thank you for your answers,
Francos

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Dominick Accattato, CTO
Infrared5 Inc.
www.infrared5.com

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: RTMPS and RTMPT bad performance

2008-10-13T07:26:17Z

Try to bind RTMP (not RTMPT) on port 80 (instead of 1935) and change the connect-string in your client to something like:

myNetConnection.connect("rtmp://myserver.com:80/myApplication/myRoom123")

If the firewall isn't an inspecting firewall but just opens a port and that's it then you're good to go.

If there is a transparent proxy somewhere on the netwerk , doing complex things to all port 80 traffic , then RTMPT is basically the only way to go, like some ppl said ; lower the quality of the stream and live with it.

If the firewall has some connection-rate limiting rules then that would affect performence ergo quality as well.

Walter

----- Original Message -----

From: franccola@...

To: red5@...

Sent: Monday, 13 October 2008 16:14

Subject: Re: [Red5] RTMPS and RTMPT bad performance

I understand, so are there any other solutions that would bypass a strict firewall (company's firewall) ?

Francos

Ignacio Lopez wrote:
Hey Francos, the thing you are experimenting is normal....RTMPT adds a http tunneling layer on top of regular RTMP, which means that every packet has to be manipulated to add/remove http headers....the same with RTMPS.
No pain, no gain :)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Francos <franccola@...> wrote:

Hello,

In order to bypass firewall, I try to use RTMPT and RTMPS for a small
conference application. However, I got very bad performance using the
both protocole (delay, audio cut etc...). Taking as hypothesis that it
was because of the port which would have less priority I tried to
establish them on port 80 and 1935. I got the same bad results.

Can anyone who know and understand these protocoles explain me shortly
why it doesn't work as good as RTMP ?

I was wondering in which way the ping_interval value had an influence on
the quality of the communication ?

Thank you for your answers,
Francos

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
  
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1722 - Release Date: 13-10-08 07:50

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: RTMPS and RTMPT bad performance

2008-10-13T07:21:20Z

only if you run RTMP on port 80.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Francos <franccola@...> wrote:

I understand, so are there any other solutions that would bypass a strict firewall (company's firewall) ?

Francos

Ignacio Lopez wrote:
Hey Francos, the thing you are experimenting is normal....RTMPT adds a http tunneling layer on top of regular RTMP, which means that every packet has to be manipulated to add/remove http headers....the same with RTMPS.
No pain, no gain :)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Francos <franccola@...> wrote:

Hello,

In order to bypass firewall, I try to use RTMPT and RTMPS for a small
conference application. However, I got very bad performance using the
both protocole (delay, audio cut etc...). Taking as hypothesis that it
was because of the port which would have less priority I tried to
establish them on port 80 and 1935. I got the same bad results.

Can anyone who know and understand these protocoles explain me shortly
why it doesn't work as good as RTMP ?

I was wondering in which way the ping_interval value had an influence on
the quality of the communication ?

Thank you for your answers,
Francos

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
  
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Dominick Accattato, CTO
Infrared5 Inc.
www.infrared5.com

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: Losing shared object

2008-10-13T07:17:30Z

oops, so he is...

SharedObjects do seem to cause problems for everyone, don't they!

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Dominick Accattato <daccattato@...> wrote:

Trevor,

I believe Fabio is creating a persistent SO

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Trevor Burton <worldofpaper@...> wrote:

The 'problem' isn't a bug - it's the defined behaviour for a non-persistent shared object.

when the last client is removed as a listener the SharedObject is cleared.

see Joachim's reply to an earlier instance of this query at

http://osflash.org/pipermail/red5_osflash.org/2007-July/013429.html

T

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:45 AM, javaguy@... <javaguy@...> wrote:

Hi,

I can confirm this behaviour for version 0.6.3
That was when I noticed that the first time.
My solution was to add an empty dummy listener to the server created SO.
This prevents the SO to get unlinked/overwritten by a client created SO.
Just use a
static final ISharedObjectListener dummy ...
so you can easily add and remove it.
Before destroying the SO you must be aware to remove the dummy listener.

Because I did not test the behaviour without this workarround since
0.6.3 I can not say if it's working currently. But I didn't read
anything in the changelog according to that.

jguy

paranoio schrieb:

> hi Fabio
> i think i had the same problem some time ago,
> i remember i just did a quick workaround so i didnt solve the problem
> properly but here is what i think :
> i believe the problem is that server side code creates its own SO and
> flash too , so i think its posible you have 2 SO's with the same name
> (but not the same object), try creating a server side SO listener to
> find out if there is only one SO using "onSharedObjectUpdate" and
> "yourSO.getClass().getName()"
>
> If you confirm that error please let the list know since i think its an
> important bug.
> The red5 version i was using when i had that problem is 0.6 so maybe
> that error does not exits anymore or maybe my code was the problem ,
> anyway i hope this helps you.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> Red5@...
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Trevor Burton
http://www.paperworld3d.com

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Dominick Accattato, CTO
Infrared5 Inc.
www.infrared5.com

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Trevor Burton
http://www.paperworld3d.com

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: RTMPS and RTMPT bad performance

2008-10-13T07:16:07Z

true, RTMPT and RTMPS won't be as performant, but they should be working decently. Francos is saying he's getting "very" bad quality. Is that true Francos. Can you try to lower the quality and the size of you video to see if the choppiness goes away? You might be reaching the limit and thus experiencing bad quality.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Ignacio Lopez <ignacio.lopez@...> wrote:

Hey Francos, the thing you are experimenting is normal....RTMPT adds a http tunneling layer on top of regular RTMP, which means that every packet has to be manipulated to add/remove http headers....the same with RTMPS.
No pain, no gain :)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Francos <franccola@...> wrote:

Hello,

In order to bypass firewall, I try to use RTMPT and RTMPS for a small
conference application. However, I got very bad performance using the
both protocole (delay, audio cut etc...). Taking as hypothesis that it
was because of the port which would have less priority I tried to
establish them on port 80 and 1935. I got the same bad results.

Can anyone who know and understand these protocoles explain me shortly
why it doesn't work as good as RTMP ?

I was wondering in which way the ping_interval value had an influence on
the quality of the communication ?

Thank you for your answers,
Francos

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Dominick Accattato, CTO
Infrared5 Inc.
www.infrared5.com

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: RTMPS and RTMPT bad performance

2008-10-13T07:14:25Z

I understand, so are there any other solutions that would bypass a strict firewall (company's firewall) ?

Francos

Ignacio Lopez wrote:

Hey Francos, the thing you are experimenting is normal....RTMPT adds a http tunneling layer on top of regular RTMP, which means that every packet has to be manipulated to add/remove http headers....the same with RTMPS.
No pain, no gain :)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Francos <franccola@...> wrote:

Hello,

In order to bypass firewall, I try to use RTMPT and RTMPS for a small
conference application. However, I got very bad performance using the
both protocole (delay, audio cut etc...). Taking as hypothesis that it
was because of the port which would have less priority I tried to
establish them on port 80 and 1935. I got the same bad results.

Can anyone who know and understand these protocoles explain me shortly
why it doesn't work as good as RTMP ?

I was wondering in which way the ping_interval value had an influence on
the quality of the communication ?

Thank you for your answers,
Francos

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
  

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: Cannot use red5 because of "due to long handshake" errors

2008-10-13T07:13:49Z

So let me understand your workflow:

you start up red5
you install the soball example "on demand"
you open the example from the web interface
you try connecting
you get the "due to long handshake" error

is that correct?

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:01 AM, mark <clunymark@...> wrote:

I just checked out revision 3211 and I am still unable to use red5
because it terminates any connection with "due to long handshake"
errors. Although I am not into the "guts" of the actual red5 server
software I wonder what can be done to fix this bug. My configuration:
Dell XPS-M1330, intel core-duo CPU, Ubuntu 8.05 "Hardy Heron" and Sun
Java SDK version 1.6.0.06.
Here is the red5 output when I try to connect the "soball" example to red5:

[INFO] [main] org.red5.server.Standalone - Startup done in: 9109 ms
[DEBUG] [http-5080-1] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol - Register
red5Engine:type=RequestProcessor,worker=http-5080,name=HttpRequest1
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting buf
- position: 22 limit: 25
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting: app
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting buf
- position: 38 limit: 46
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting:
flashVer
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting buf
- position: 64 limit: 70
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting: swfUrl
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting buf
- position: 118 limit: 123
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting: tcUrl
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting buf
- position: 153 limit: 157
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting: fpad
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting buf
- position: 161 limit: 173
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting:
capabilities
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting buf
- position: 184 limit: 195
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting:
audioCodecs
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting buf
- position: 206 limit: 217
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting:
videoCodecs
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting buf
- position: 228 limit: 241
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting:
videoFunction
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting buf
- position: 252 limit: 259
[INFO] [SocketAcceptorIoProcessor-0.0] org.red5.io.amf.Input - Sting:
pageUrl
[WARN] [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1]
org.red5.server.net.rtmp.RTMPConnection - Closing RTMPMinaConnection
from 127.0.0.1 : 38481 to localhost (in: 3405 out 3215 ), with id
28544220 due to long handshake

thanks a lot, Mark

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Dominick Accattato, CTO
Infrared5 Inc.
www.infrared5.com

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English

Re: RTMPS and RTMPT bad performance

2008-10-13T07:13:22Z

I've had some "bad" results using live video...specially for the broadcaster...never tried it with VOD...the live app is still usable, but not as good as RTMP

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Dominick Accattato <daccattato@...> wrote:

I can't say for sure, but thought I'd add my input. I've used rtmpt and didn't have bad performance in the past. Any other experiences?

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Francos <franccola@...> wrote:

Hello,

In order to bypass firewall, I try to use RTMPT and RTMPS for a small
conference application. However, I got very bad performance using the
both protocole (delay, audio cut etc...). Taking as hypothesis that it
was because of the port which would have less priority I tried to
establish them on port 80 and 1935. I got the same bad results.

Can anyone who know and understand these protocoles explain me shortly
why it doesn't work as good as RTMP ?

I was wondering in which way the ping_interval value had an influence on
the quality of the communication ?

Thank you for your answers,
Francos

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

--
Dominick Accattato, CTO
Infrared5 Inc.
www.infrared5.com

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@...
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

From forum: Red5 - English