On 01/02/08 23:07, Larry Evans wrote:
> On 01/02/08 15:08, Stjepan Rajko wrote:
>> The review of the Switch library by Steven Watanabe will begin this
>> Saturday, Jan 5th.
[snip]
> The attachment contains an alternative which uses no preprocessing.
> It uses more memory because of the static fun_vec in:
>
> fun_switch_impl::our_vec
>
OOPS. I see a flaw in fun_switch. It doesn't handle missing
numerals. IOW, the CASES could contain a non_sequential_range,
as one of the test_switch.cpp tests shows.
Sorry about that :(
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
