On Friday 02 May 2008, Dan Stowell wrote:
> I agree that if the "main" or "default" sclang editor was a
> cross-platform one that would be great, and would be a good way to
> make the best use of limited developer time. I can see that trying to
> get community agreement on a toolkit (or whatever) would be futile -
> would we have agreed on a Java GUI server? I doubt it, instead sciss
> just made it and It Was Good.
>
> Similarly the future of crossplatform sclang editor is going to be
> determined by where the developer effort goes and where the
> user-takeup goes. At the moment we have plenty of interesting
> candidates, and I feel like the evolutionary race is just beginning...
I once started to hack a little crossplatform sclang editor (all you need is a
working C++ compiler, GNU make and Qt 4.x):
http://tapas.affenbande.org/qcollider_screen2.pngBut due to the unavailableness of SuperCollider in my 64bit Ubuntu Hardy
installation i kinda lost sight of SC for the last few months.
When i tried to build it myself i stumbled over 64 bit compatibility issues :(
http://tapas.affenbande.org/qcollider/Tarballs are available here. I don't have time ATM to hack on it seriously
even if i had a working SC install, but maybe someone likes to keep on
hacking it for the time being..
Regards,
Flo
--
Palimm Palimm!
http://tapas.affenbande.org_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list
sc-users@...
http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users
