Re: playbuf in jitlib
|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Re: playbuf in jitlib
by julio
::
Rate this Message:
Sorry guys,
please ignore, I should have used the lag values !!! still puzzled why JitLib won't do it, though, it works for the synthesis UGens, why not for the PlayBuf? anyway, further thoughts welcome ! thank you ! J _______________________________________________ sc-users mailing list sc-users@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users |
|
|
Re: playbuf in jitlib
by Julian Rohrhuber
::
Rate this Message:
>Sorry guys,
> >please ignore, I should have used the lag values !!! > >still puzzled why JitLib won't do it, though, it works for the >synthesis UGens, why not for the PlayBuf? > >anyway, further thoughts welcome ! I can imagine that there was no fadeTime argument/control in your SynthDef? I have never encountered a difference between UGens concerning NodeProxy. -- . _______________________________________________ sc-users mailing list sc-users@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users |
|
|
Re: playbuf in jitlib
by Julian Rohrhuber
::
Rate this Message:
have a look at EnvGate - this is the most practical thing in this
case, you get the controls with it. > >Sorry guys, >> >>please ignore, I should have used the lag values !!! >> >>still puzzled why JitLib won't do it, though, it works for the >>synthesis UGens, why not for the PlayBuf? >> >>anyway, further thoughts welcome ! > >I can imagine that there was no fadeTime argument/control in your >SynthDef? I have never encountered a difference between UGens >concerning NodeProxy. >-- > > > > > >. >_______________________________________________ >sc-users mailing list >sc-users@... >http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users -- . _______________________________________________ sc-users mailing list sc-users@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users |
|
|
Re: playbuf in jitlib
by julio
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Julian,
I thought that I could get the synth playing on a node and then the fadeTime is sent to the node independently of who lives there...? is that not the case? so in theory a synthdef which contains a sine wave blaring out can be crossfaded with another that has a sawtooth if I set the fadeTime for the node but change the node's 'content'.... thus I did not consider creating a fade time within an env residing in the synthdef .... my 'envelope' is my use of jitlib by setting the fadeTime... am I making any sense?? :) let me know, maestro ! thanks, Julio On 15 May 2008, at 10:09, Julian Rohrhuber wrote: >> Sorry guys, >> >> please ignore, I should have used the lag values !!! >> >> still puzzled why JitLib won't do it, though, it works for the >> synthesis UGens, why not for the PlayBuf? >> >> anyway, further thoughts welcome ! > > I can imagine that there was no fadeTime argument/control in your > SynthDef? I have never encountered a difference between UGens > concerning NodeProxy. > -- > > > > > > . > _______________________________________________ > sc-users mailing list > sc-users@... > http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users _______________________________________________ sc-users mailing list sc-users@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users |
|
|
Re: playbuf in jitlib
by julio
::
Rate this Message:
of course, the other thing is I am setting new synth argument values
as I go along because I am running a stereo file which I don't want to reset from the start (this is some spatialisation exercise I am involved in), so I want to change stuff as it carries on playing without restarting it... thanks again ! Julio On 15 May 2008, at 10:22, Julian Rohrhuber wrote: > have a look at EnvGate - this is the most practical thing in this > case, you get the controls with it. > >>> Sorry guys, >>> >>> please ignore, I should have used the lag values !!! >>> >>> still puzzled why JitLib won't do it, though, it works for the >>> synthesis UGens, why not for the PlayBuf? >>> >>> anyway, further thoughts welcome ! >> >> I can imagine that there was no fadeTime argument/control in your >> SynthDef? I have never encountered a difference between UGens >> concerning NodeProxy. >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> . >> _______________________________________________ >> sc-users mailing list >> sc-users@... >> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users > > > -- > > > > > > . > _______________________________________________ > sc-users mailing list > sc-users@... > http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users _______________________________________________ sc-users mailing list sc-users@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users |
|
|
Re: playbuf in jitlib
by julio
::
Rate this Message:
Thanks Julian,
I think I have now understood what I need to do. I was instantiating things badly... i On 15 May 2008, at 10:22, Julian Rohrhuber wrote: > have a look at EnvGate - this is the most practical thing in this > case, you get the controls with it. > >>> Sorry guys, >>> >>> please ignore, I should have used the lag values !!! >>> >>> still puzzled why JitLib won't do it, though, it works for the >>> synthesis UGens, why not for the PlayBuf? >>> >>> anyway, further thoughts welcome ! >> >> I can imagine that there was no fadeTime argument/control in your >> SynthDef? I have never encountered a difference between UGens >> concerning NodeProxy. >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> . >> _______________________________________________ >> sc-users mailing list >> sc-users@... >> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users > > > -- > > > > > > . > _______________________________________________ > sc-users mailing list > sc-users@... > http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users _______________________________________________ sc-users mailing list sc-users@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |