« Return to Thread: function in nls argument

Re: function in nls argument

by Katharine Mullen :: Rate this Message:

You indeed found a bug. I can reproduce it (which I should have tried to
do on other examples in the first place!). Thanks for finding it.

It will be fixed in version 1.1-0 which I will submit to CRAN soon.

On Fri, 9 May 2008, elnano wrote:

>
> Find the data (data_nls.lm_moyano.txt) here:
> ftp://ftp.bgc-jena.mpg.de/pub/outgoing/fmoyano
>
>
>
> Katharine Mullen wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the details - it sounds like a bug. You can either send me the
> > data in an email off-list or make it available on-line somewhere, so that
> > I and other people can download it.
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-help@... mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/function-in-nls-argument-tp17108100p17146812.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@... mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

______________________________________________
R-help@... mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

« Return to Thread: function in nls argument