Re: delete-delay vs. delete-after in 3.0.2 (and possible bug)

Wayne Davison wrote:
> per-dir rules set right for both the on-going copying, and a late delete
> scan).  I don't think this is likely to change any time soon, but it
> would be nice to have a way of doing something like early per-dir filter
> copying or something.
>
> ..wayne..
>

Oki, thanks for clarification.

Still, in that case - what's the benefit of using --delete-delay option ?
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html