On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:25 PM, amsmota <
amsmota@...> wrote:
>
> Hmm, actually I never looked at the BundleDbPersistenceManager, can you
> elaborate a little on what it does and why is preferred over
> DatabasePersistenceManager?
BundleDbPersistenceManager is the current default persistence manager.
instead of storing every node and property separately (like
SimpleDbPersistenceManager does) it stores a 'bundle' of the node and its
properties in a single table row, thus significantly reducing
network-roundtrips.
cheers
stefan
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
> Stefan Guggisberg-2 wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:33 PM, amsmota <
amsmota@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> The reason I'm asking this is because I see that exists 4 sets of .ddl in
> >> the
> >> application, and I changed only 2, corresponding to the
> >> DatabaseFileSystem /
> >> DatabasePersistenceManager. What are this other 2 for?
> >>
> >> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.journal
> >
> > those are used by o.a.j.c.journal.DatabaseJournal. if you'e not using the
> > clustering feature you don't have to care.
> >
> >> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.bundle
> >
> > those are used by o.a.j.c.persistence.bundle.BundleDbPersistenceManager
> > and
> > subclasses which are the (preferred) alternatives to
> > DatabasePersistenceManager
> > and subclasses.
> >
> > cheers
> > stefan
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> amsmota wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Do I have to be aware of other possible clashes besides
> >>> DatabaseFileSystem
> >>> / DatabasePersistenceManager ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
http://www.nabble.com/Use-of-diferent-or-same-schemaObjectPrefixes-tp17079492p17128109.html> >> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Use-of-diferent-or-same-schemaObjectPrefixes-tp17079492p17208371.html>
>
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
