Re: Unit 10 Discussion

For me the initial assessment served more as a reflection of the past years ministry, while the Learning Type Measure was more informative in revealing my personality.  I found the result of the Learning Type Measure to be very interesting and intriguing. The scores results showed me that I have multiple profiles. My high scores tied, I scored the same for Imaginative learner as I did for Common Sense Learner. My second scores also tied, I scored the same for Analytic Learner as I did for Dynamic Learner.  I was really fascinated by the result, because is revealed very much to me the outcome of my life. I grew up living in different places under different circumstances and various situations which taught me adaptability.  For me that ability is a strength that enables me to be like Paul the Apostle who said “to be all things to all people.”  The Learning Type Measure also scored me high in liking school, valuing time, creative, artistic and social. Being made more aware of these positives characteristics help me to define and maximize my ministry endeavors in this setting.