Re: UI Enhancements

by Bill Schwab :: Rate this Message:

Jason,

I suspect we should try to separate from morphic in the future, but not
for a first pass. Let us know if you think of any problems.

Is there any interest in running on top of Pavel's minimal morphic
image? Whatever you guys want to do is fine. I am looking to Pavel as
a likely source of cleaner images, but there is no rush.

Bill

Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of Anesthesiology
PO Box 100254
Gainesville, FL 32610-0254

Email: bschwab@...
Tel: (352) 846-1285
FAX: (352) 392-7029

>>> jason.johnson.081@... 11/01/07 12:37 AM >>>
On 11/1/07, Jason Johnson <jason.johnson.081@...> wrote:

> On 11/1/07, Bill Schwab <BSchwab@...> wrote:
> > Gary,
> >
> > Have we reached any consensus on MVP? I _think_ it can be done with
> > morphs serving as views to start, and then break off into other
> > directions if we chose, or find it necessary.
>
> I'm not sure. My vote is obviously for MVP. But who be able to work
> on this? My plate is full for some time, and as you mentioned, you
> can't work directly on it.

I meant to add: I don't see any problem using Morphic for the view.
_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
UI@...
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui

_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
UI@...
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui

« Return to Thread: UI Enhancements