Philippe Ribet wrote:
> Phil Malin wrote:
> [snip]
>>
> Could you please try again with C compiler optimisations turned off?
> (-O0 for gcc)
>
> I didn't say there is a bug in the C opmitimiser code! The effect will
> be to use memory instead of registers. Does it works better?
>
> Hope this will help,
>
Actually, I didn't have any optimisations - I had turned these off. But
I did have unroll-loops, inline functions and setting the architecture
to a Pentium4. I just ran it again with no compiler options except for
'-g' and I get exactly the same problem (same place, same memory location).
Phil.