« Return to Thread: Some challenges for the morphic team

Re: Some challenges for the morphic team

by Stéphane Ducasse-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

>> Start to convert systematically the Tools to use the ToolBuilder
>> abstraction.
>
> Are these the tools that Monticello browsers are written in?  The
> Monticello browsers seem to be fairly buggy (losing event handlers on
> buttons after switching projects), with some display issues (turtle
> droppings) and serious usability issues (i.e., resizing panes).


I do not think that this has something to do with ToolBuilder.
But you can ask to Colin.


> I would expect these problems NOT be transferred to the legacy  
> browsers.
>
> BTW, why not the OmniBrowser abstraction?

But this is not at the same level. ToolBuilder is just a was to avoid  
direct reference to
a framework. Instead of hardcoding PopUpMenu everwhere, we rely on  
UIManager.

Stef
>
> Regards,
>   Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Morphic mailing list
> Morphic@...
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic

_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
Morphic@...
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic

 « Return to Thread: Some challenges for the morphic team