Re: Rome-fetcher in Maven?

[Mark Woodman]

CCing Rome-Dev

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Joseph Ottinger <joeo@...> wrote:

Can we update the maven repositories with a more recent version of rome-fetcher? It has a declared dependency on rome 0.3, and ... well... that's archaic.

--
Joseph B. Ottinger
http://enigmastation.com
Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com

[Nick Lothian]

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.

I’ve now been granted the maven publisher role for the java.net maven2 repository, so I hope I’ll be able to make this happen soon.

 

Nick

 

From: mark.a.woodman@... [mailto:mark.a.woodman@...] On Behalf Of Mark Woodman
Sent: Saturday, 14 June 2008 12:52 AM
To: Rome-Dev; joeo@...
Subject: Re: Rome-fetcher in Maven?

 

CCing Rome-Dev

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Joseph Ottinger <joeo@...> wrote:

Can we update the maven repositories with a more recent version of rome-fetcher? It has a declared dependency on rome 0.3, and ... well... that's archaic.

--
Joseph B. Ottinger
http://enigmastation.com
Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com

 

---

IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain private or confidential information. If you think you may not be the intended recipient, or if you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete all copies of this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not reproduce any part of this e-mail or disclose its contents to any other party. This email represents the views of the individual sender, which do not necessarily reflect those of education.au limited except where the sender expressly states otherwise. It is your responsibility to scan this email and any files transmitted with it for viruses or any other defects. education.au limited will not be liable for any loss, damage or consequence caused directly or indirectly by this email.

[Antony Stubbs]

Any progress on this?

Nick Lothian wrote:

I've now been granted the maven publisher role for the java.net maven2 repository, so I hope I'll be able to make this happen soon.

Nick

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Mark Woodman
Sent: Saturday, 14 June 2008 12:52 AM
To: Rome-Dev; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Rome-fetcher in Maven?

CCing Rome-Dev

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Joseph Ottinger <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Can we update the maven repositories with a more recent version of rome-fetcher? It has a declared dependency on rome 0.3, and ... well... that's archaic.

--
Joseph B. Ottinger
http://enigmastation.com
Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com


________________________________
IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain private or confidential information. If you think you may not be the intended recipient, or if you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete all copies of this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not reproduce any part of this e-mail or disclose its contents to any other party. This email represents the views of the individual sender, which do not necessarily reflect those of education.au limited except where the sender expressly states otherwise. It is your responsibility to scan this email and any files transmitted with it for viruses or any other defects. education.au limited will not be liable for any loss, damage or consequence caused directly or indirectly by this email.

[Antony Stubbs]

Do you need someone to create a pom.xml based on https://rome.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83 for rome-fetcher?


Any progress on this?

Nick Lothian wrote:

I've now been granted the maven publisher role for the java.net maven2 repository, so I hope I'll be able to make this happen soon.

Nick

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Mark Woodman
Sent: Saturday, 14 June 2008 12:52 AM
To: Rome-Dev; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Rome-fetcher in Maven?

CCing Rome-Dev

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Joseph Ottinger <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Can we update the maven repositories with a more recent version of rome-fetcher? It has a declared dependency on rome 0.3, and ... well... that's archaic.

--
Joseph B. Ottinger
http://enigmastation.com
Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com


________________________________
IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain private or confidential information. If you think you may not be the intended recipient, or if you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete all copies of this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not reproduce any part of this e-mail or disclose its contents to any other party. This email represents the views of the individual sender, which do not necessarily reflect those of education.au limited except where the sender expressly states otherwise. It is your responsibility to scan this email and any files transmitted with it for viruses or any other defects. education.au limited will not be liable for any loss, damage or consequence caused directly or indirectly by this email.