--- Kevin Jackson <
foamdino@...> wrote:
> > > Personally I think we should at least consider
> including a 'script'
> > > language with the full dist (starting from 1.8)
> so that scriptdef
> > > isn't a lame duck out of the box.
> >
> > Biggest problem might be that the language needs
> to be license
> > compatible.
>
> Yes I can see this as a problem - sorry didn't
> consider it before.
>
Talking about flamebait, I'll toss this out there: we
could create our own scripting language... with
domain-specific slants if/where applicable... this
would extricate us from any distribution issues, and,
dare I say it, could be fun if we could find ways to
make a DSL that is Ant-focused. ;)
-Matt
[SNIP]
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...