|
View:
New views
15 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Re: Radio...
by Lionel Peterson
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message >From: Ethan O'Toole <ethan@...>
>Date: 2008/05/16 Fri AM 09:36:18 EDT >To: The Rescue List <rescue@...> >Subject: Re: [rescue] Dayton Hamfest >Anyone ever run a shortwave pirate station? > >Seems like more fun than normal 2 meter repeater action. I guess it could be, but there would be a lot of challenges (aside from the illegal nature of the broadcast), namely securing SW equipment (broadcast band equipment is much easier to get, AM & FM), arranging a suitable antenna, and balancing the need to maintain some sort of schedule and not being predictable enough to attract the attention of the FCC. I had thought about the idea (I've always been interested in radio since I went to summer camp Shaw-Mi-Del-Eca[0] in West Virginia (over the hill from The Greenbriar Resort, the off-site recovery site for US Gov't in case of attack[1]), and they had an AM carrier current transmitter[2]...), but my thought never went beyond the theoretical... Lionel [0] http://johnbrashear.tripod.com/shaw-mi.html [1] http://www.avhub.net/congressionalhideawaygreenbriar.htm [2] http://johnbrashear.tripod.com/wlcr.html _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
|
|
Re: Radio...
by Bill Bradford
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:24:59AM -0500, Lionel Peterson wrote:
> >Anyone ever run a shortwave pirate station? > >Seems like more fun than normal 2 meter repeater action. > > I guess it could be, but there would be a lot of challenges (aside from > the illegal nature of the broadcast) On that note, can you guys take any discussion of violating FCC rules to private email? I hate to have to ask you, but you know how it goes. Thanks. Bill -- Bill Bradford Houston, Texas _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
|
|
Re: Radio...
by wa2egp
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message > I guess it could be, but there would be a lot of challenges (aside from the
> illegal nature of the broadcast), namely securing SW equipment (broadcast band > equipment is much easier to get, AM & FM), arranging a suitable antenna, and > balancing the need to maintain some sort of schedule and not being predictable > enough to attract the attention of the FCC. I had thought about the idea (I've > always been interested in radio since I went to summer camp Shaw-Mi-Del-Eca[0] > in West Virginia (over the hill from The Greenbriar Resort, the off-site > recovery site for US Gov't in case of attack[1]), and they had an AM carrier > current transmitter[2]...), but my thought never went beyond the theoretical... > > Lionel Depends. There are a lot of old AM "boat anchors" that can pump out about 100 watts or more on the short wave bands. A dipole antenna could be enough. How much coverage (and notice) is the deciding factor. Bob _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
|
|
Re: Radio...
by Bill Bradford
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:47:48PM +0000, wa2egp@... wrote:
> Depends. There are a lot of old AM "boat anchors" that can pump out > about 100 watts or more on the short wave bands. A dipole antenna could > be enough. How much coverage (and notice) is the deciding factor. Please take discussions about violating FCC rules to private email. Thanks! Bill -- Bill Bradford Houston, Texas _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
|
|
Re: Radio...
by Ethan O'Toole
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message > Please take discussions about violating FCC rules to private email.
> Thanks! > Bill The FCC only handles America. -- 05 REM Signature 10 PRINT " Ethan O'Toole " 20 PRINT " FLICKR ", " http://www.flickr.com/photos/ethanotoole " 30 PRINT " YOUTUBE ", " www.youtube.com/user/telmnstr " 40 PRINT " HOMEPAGE ", " users.757.org/~ethan " RUN _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
|
|
Re: Radio...
by wa2egp
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Ethan O'Toole <ethan@...> > > > Please take discussions about violating FCC rules to private email. > > Thanks! > > Bill > > The FCC only handles America. Bill's in America. Bill speaks, we listen :) Bob _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
|
|
Re: Radio...
by Ethan O'Toole
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message > Bill's in America. Bill speaks, we listen :)
> Bob Oh yea. I'm in America too! And I've already met the FCC agent :-) I miss our radio station :-( I've actually got a HAM radio too! I just never use it. A few friends got their licenses, and they don't use theirs either. As a hobby, is it not dying? I see the use, but it seems like there are more efficent ways of communications now. DSTARS seems neat but waaaay too expensive. -- 05 REM Signature 10 PRINT " Ethan O'Toole " 20 PRINT " FLICKR ", " http://www.flickr.com/photos/ethanotoole " 30 PRINT " YOUTUBE ", " www.youtube.com/user/telmnstr " 40 PRINT " HOMEPAGE ", " users.757.org/~ethan " RUN _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
|
|
Re: Radio...
by wa2egp
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Bill Bradford <mrbill@...> > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:47:48PM +0000, wa2egp@... wrote: > > Depends. There are a lot of old AM "boat anchors" that can pump out > > about 100 watts or more on the short wave bands. A dipole antenna could > > be enough. How much coverage (and notice) is the deciding factor. > > Please take discussions about violating FCC rules to private email. > Thanks! > > Bill Sorry. I posted that before I saw your "request". Bob _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
|
|
Re: Radio...
by Patrick Giagnocavo 717-201-3366
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Ethan O'Toole wrote:
>> Please take discussions about violating FCC rules to private email. >> Thanks! >> Bill > > The FCC only handles America. > That's what you think. --Patrick _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
|
|
Re: Radio...
by Bill Bradford
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:22:59PM -0400, Ethan O'Toole wrote:
> The FCC only handles America. Yes, but I don't want to get caught up in any charges of "facilitating", etc. Discussion is fine, just please move it to private email. (I hate that I have to make this request, in this "post 9/11 world" blah blah TERRISTS DIRTY NUKE BOMB UZI NAPALM NSA LINE EATER [0] etc) Bill [0] http://catb.org/esr/jargon/html/N/NSA-line-eater.html - if we'd only known how close to the truth it actually was.. -- Bill Bradford Houston, Texas _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Radio...
by Lionel Peterson-2
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message On May 16, 2008, at 11:37 PM, Bill Bradford <mrbill@...> wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:22:59PM -0400, Ethan O'Toole wrote: >> The FCC only handles America. > > Yes, but I don't want to get caught up in any charges of > "facilitating", > etc. Discussion is fine, just please move it to private email. > > (I hate that I have to make this request, in this "post 9/11 world" > blah blah TERRISTS DIRTY NUKE BOMB UZI NAPALM NSA LINE EATER [0] etc) Right after you hit send, the magic box in the secret closet deep inside MAE East lit up like a Christmas tree! Tee-hee! Lionel _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
|
|
Re: Radio...
by wa2egp
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message > Oh yea. I'm in America too! And I've already met the FCC agent :-) I miss
> our radio station :-( > > I've actually got a HAM radio too! I just never use it. A few friends got > their licenses, and they don't use theirs either. As a hobby, is it not > dying? I see the use, but it seems like there are more efficent ways of > communications now. > > DSTARS seems neat but waaaay too expensive. Ham radio is not dying as you put it unless people with licenses don't get on. The numbers are down but there are many competing communication forms, whether they are more "efficient" or not, I can't say because I don't know what you mean by efficient. (See the morse vs. test messaging video from Leno) I think it is more fun. Right now the sun spot cycle is at a minimum so DX is not as common but give it a few years if that's your thing. These days mobile is about 99% of my operating but I'm working on a portable setup for the summer (a few camping trips are planned). I favor the HF bands and tend to use low power. I would never try to get away with violating the FCC rules. Not worth it. Screw around on the ham bands, the hams will be the first to find you and report you to the friendly candy company. You violated the rules and lost your equipment. Oh well. Bob _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Radio...
by wa2egp
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Lionel Peterson <lionel4287@...> > > >From: wa2egp@... > >Date: 2008/05/17 Sat PM 09:35:09 EDT > >To: The Rescue List <rescue@...> > >Subject: Re: [rescue] Radio... > > <snip> > > >I would never try to get away with violating the FCC rules. Not worth it. > Screw around on the ham bands, the hams will be the first to find you and report > you to the friendly candy company. You violated the rules and lost your > equipment. Oh well. > > Back in the '70s on "11 meters" we used to have "Antenna Parties" at offending > stations... I never participated, but heard of a couple while I was in CA. > Usually it was for running a "foot warmer" or pointing your cubical-quad > "moonrakre" beam at a local users station and blasting them... > > Lionel We had "membership drives" when we found some one on the ham bands that didn't belong there. A bunch of us would meet over their house and offer to help them get their ham license. I know that sounds like something else :) but we would just inform them that the FCC really does not like illegal operating but if they actually wanted to get their license, we would help them with the code, theory and rules. If nothing else, having a bunch of people showing up at your house sends a message that if amateurs can find you, the FCC certainly can. BTW, we used to have transmitter hunts on 10 mtrs. Two rules; don't violate any laws and don't cross state lines. :) Bob _______________________________________________ rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |