« Return to Thread: RFC: File vitality
I would suggest this presumes that the person doing the install
knows what they are doing! In a corporate environment that may be true and in
that case you could build installs with vital off (having said that most of our
installs are run silently so failing is a better option). I think the install
failing is preferable to having a support call because one “vital”
file is missing.
Neil
From:
Christopher Painter [mailto:chrpai@...]
Sent: 04 May 2008 14:48
To: Neil Sleightholm; WiX-users
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] RFC: File vitality
There is a recent PSDK.MSI thread
where Simon Scott suspects a FilesInUse pattern bug:
He thinks MSI is having a false
positive on a locked file and that pressing ignore results in a successful
instalation. In this scenario, making all component files vital by
default would actually result in a blocked installation.
It would be difficult to predict
in advance of shipping a product which files might trip this possible bug so
IMHO it might be best to leave vital not set and let the administrator roll
the dice when choosing to hit ignore, retry or cancel. If you don't,
you'll be getting the support call anyways since the install rolled back.
Neil Sleightholm <neil@...> wrote:
I would vote for make vital true by default with the option of setting
it off via the command line. I have never really thought there are many
occasions when making a file optional would be ok. I would guess that a
lot of installs (mine included) don't set this but that clicking
"ignore" would actually break the install.
Neil
Neil Sleightholm
X2 Systems Limited
neil@...
-----Original Message-----
From: wix-users-bounces@...
[mailto:wix-users-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Bob Arnson
Sent: 04 May 2008 05:04
To: WiX-users
Subject: [WiX-users] RFC: File vitality
I just posted a request for comments on my blog, to ask about a change
we're considering to simplify WiX authoring. You can see the post here:
http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/05/03/rfc-vitality/
The short version is that we're considering marking all files with the
msidbFileAttributesVital bit set by default. That's a behavior change
and we wanted to get feedback before deciding either way. Please read
the whole post and let us know what you think, either via blog post
comments or mail on this list.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/j
avaone
_______________________________________________
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
Be a better friend, newshound,
and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try
it now.
« Return to Thread: RFC: File vitality
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |