Re: Phasers (were: TaskBarriers)

This is very cool. I have been rolling my own version of with similar
functionality that is nowhere near as nice or flexible.

Just a quick naming question, as awesome as the name Phaser is, wouldn't
PhasedBarrier possibly be more accurate?

Doug Lea wrote:
> The flexible barrier functionality that was previously restricted
> to ForkJoinTasks (in class forkjoin.TaskBarrier) is being
> redone as class Phaser (targeted for j.u.c, not j.u.c.forkjoin), that
> can be applied in all kinds of tasks...

cheers,
jed.
_______________________________________________
Concurrency-interest mailing list
Concurrency-interest@...
http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest