John Darrington <
john@...> writes:
> Any objection to committing the following patch then? I think
> that it is all that is needed.
>
> Looks ok to me.
Thanks, I did so.
> In the not too distant future, I'd like to get rid of the libglade
> dependency anyway, which will make this somewhat moot.
OK.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
pspp-dev@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev