Re: Nikon Digest, Vol 34, Issue 5

[Nelson Kao Wei Chin]

As many posts confirm, the 14-24 2.8G seems incredible, but what about the
new FX 24-70 2.8G? Anybody knows where are reviews about it?

Thanks

Kao
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://nikonusers.com/pipermail/nikon_nikonusers.com/attachments/20080505/6345c8b5/attachment.html 
_______________________________________________
Nikon mailing list
Nikon@...
http://nikonusers.com/mailman/listinfo/nikon_nikonusers.com

[Adam Maas]

It's quickly getting a rep for being as good a performer as the 14-24.
Definitely better than the 28-70 f2.8 AF-S, but not as big a jump in
performance as the 28-70 was already incredible. The 24-70's pretty
clearly one of the two best lenses in the range (Matched only by the
new Zeiss ZA 24-70 SSM, for the Sony Alpha).

-Adam

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Nelson Kao Wei Chin <nelson_k@...> wrote:

> As many posts confirm, the 14-24 2.8G seems incredible, but what about the
>  new FX 24-70 2.8G? Anybody knows where are reviews about it?
>
>  Thanks
>
>  Kao
>  -------------- next part --------------
>  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>  URL: http://nikonusers.com/pipermail/nikon_nikonusers.com/attachments/20080505/6345c8b5/attachment.html
>  _______________________________________________
>  Nikon mailing list
>  Nikon@...
>  http://nikonusers.com/mailman/listinfo/nikon_nikonusers.com
>

--
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

_______________________________________________
Nikon mailing list
Nikon@...
http://nikonusers.com/mailman/listinfo/nikon_nikonusers.com