Filip, this is a fairly rare case where I disagree with you ;)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<
devlists@...> wrote:
> simply because it requires changes, I like to think we work according to
It can be done without requiring any changes.
> "if it aint broke, don't fix it", and since the maven build doesn't give us
> anything the ANT build already does, then there seems to be little point of
It's easier. That's it.
> I suggest you go back in the archives, the comments you'll see this time
> around, will be the same when this issue was brought up last and was voted
Not true. I, for one, spoke against it in the past. Having used
Maven 2 for 2+ years, I now prefer it over Ant. Moreover, I can
testify that it's saved me and my teams considerable time and resulted
in more consistent and cleaner builds. I haven't even bothered to
subscribe to
users@..., much less
dev@..., I've just been
a pure user and it's been cool.
But like I said earlier, it's not worth disrupting the current Tomcat
build or source layout. Only if it can be done without requiring any
changes, which it can.
Yoav
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
