Quoting Archie Cobbs <
archie@...>:
> Hello fellow Ivy users,
>
> I'd like to announce a new little project I've started, and ask for your
> feedback (and help, if interested).
>
> This project has two basic parts...
>
> 1. *Builder
> Resolver*<
http://ivyroundup.googlecode.com/svn/wiki/files/builder.html>:
> a new Ivy resolver that accesses ivy files and "build
> instructions" from an
> online "builder" repository. "Builder" repositories contain ivy.xml files
> but no artifacts. To get the artifacts, the build instructions are
> downloaded from the repository and executed locally. These instructions
> specify additional resource(s) to download and how to build the artifacts
> from them, for example, by downloading a project's original distribution
> archive directly from their web site and extracting the desired artifacts.
> 2. *Ivy RoundUp Repository* <
http://ivyroundup.googlecode.com/>: an
> online, open-source community "Builder" repository for all Ivy users.
[snip]
I read the thread on the dev list, and was thoroughly interested in
the idea of a community-maintained public ivy.xml repository, because
a carefully defined ivy.xml provides a lot more value than the ones
generated from the pom, and would be something worth sharing.
On the other hand, I'm not sure I see the value in the builder
resolver. I guess I'm having a hard time imagining a use case where I
would prefer building a 3rd party artifact locally rather than simply
downloading it through an ibiblio resolver, or from a company-level
proxy repository.
Cheers.
--
Jing Xue