Re: Is our objective for 2.0 too ambitious? (was Re: Ivy 2.0 planning)

> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Bruce Atherton
> <bruce@...> wrote:
>
> > Typically you would use a new Status, but I am
> uncertain about how much
> > control you have over the Apache Jira instance.
> Can you introduce new
> > workflow for your project?
>
> It seems I can, but I'm not sure about the policy.
> Maybe other Ant members
> can comment on this?
>
>
> >
> > I don't think that merely setting the priority
> should result in moving
> > between Open and In Progress. There should be an
> intermediate state.
>
> Cocoon workflow has "OnHold" and "Continued" status,
> that we could use to
> indicate that all bugs are OnHold until we review
> their priorities.
>
> What do you guys think?

>
> Xavier
>
>
> >
> >
> > Xavier Hanin wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Nicolas
> Lalevée <
> > > nicolas.lalevee@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I am in favor of a such classification too.
> About the process to
> > > > classify
> > > > them, I would say that it would be the same
> process as fixing issues.
> > > > A
> > > > committer get interested to an issue, try to
> found out to what's
> > > > behind,
> > > > and
> > > > then decides its priority. And the other
> committers check via the
> > > > notifications@ant list.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > But how do we know that the issue priority has
> been reviewed, especially
> > > if
> > > it doesn't change?
> > >
> > > Xavier
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@...
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@...
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
> http://xhab.blogspot.com/
> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
> http://www.xoocode.org/
>