Carsten Haubold wrote:
> I'm confronted with another issue here: I just noticed that if I merge
> two CVs and remove the points from the mesh::points vector, I need to
> change all indices referring to the points.. Is there any better way
> to do this? Or should I just let the unused point in there not being
> referenced?
> I dont think the latter is a good idea, but the most easy one :).
I would go with the latter, at-least in the short-term. Keep in mind
that a point may be shared amongst any of the geometric primitives in a
mesh, not just NURBS. Determining which points are truly unused - and
getting rid-of-them - is a good job for a plugin.
Cheers,
Tim
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone_______________________________________________
K3d-development mailing list
K3d-development@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/k3d-development
