Daniel Gollub
Thanks for your answer. Concerning the questions:
a) batch processing:that would be really nice to support for lengthy operations, but I'm not sure when I'm going to implement it. The principle is quite simple (just create a feed with all the operations) but can get really boring creating that XMLs using libxml.
b) multiple resources: I assume that you are talking about multiple calendars? If that is the case, its not implemented (all the operations are done in the user default calendar) but would be really easy to do (just change the atom feed URL).
What is in my priority list is: edit (which should be easy because the logic is the same of 'add' event entry) and select results using the 'updated' field. That would allow do one first slow sync (where all the events are dumped from the server) and later syncs would use fast sync (just asking for events that had changed).
I will base my work on revision 3307 as you
suggested.
Any question can I refer to you in the IRC channel? (my nick is Savago).
Best regards
Adenilson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Opensync-devel mailing list
Opensync-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensync-devel
