On 29/02/2008, Xavier Hanin <
xavier.hanin@...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As reported by IVY-297, Ivy suffers from some name inconsistencies and
> strange attribute names. Ivy 2.0 is a good opportunity to fix some of them,
> since I think we can afford some more deprecation warnings.
>
> So I'd like to fix IVY-297 by marking allownomd as deprecated, and providing
> a descriptor="required | optional" attribute.
>
+1
> To go further, we could rename the attribute skipbuildwithoutivy in
> buildlist in skipbuildwithoutdescriptor, or even better change it to
> buildwithoutdescriptor="skip | fail | warn | tail | head", which wold make
> it both more readable and more powerful.
>
+1
> Another area where the name 'ivy' is used to talk about module descriptors
> in general is patterns. This lead to some strange settings, where you give
> an 'ivy' pattern to tell where the poms are. In this case I think we could
> support both 'ivy' and 'descriptor' (for resolver patterns for instance),
> since the use case for ivy files is still predominant, so I don't think
> deprecating the old name would really be better.
??? I don't know.
--
Gilles Scokart
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
