On May 9, 10:23 am, Ezra Parker <
ezrapar...@...> wrote:
> Let me begin by saying that I have not worked with FarCry for very
> long, so I am not heavily invested in the present licensing model as
> others on this list may be. I am also proceeding under the assumption
> that any non-distributed derived works would not need to be released.
> As I understand this, it means that any code in a plugin, project, or
> skeleton need not be published as long as my client retains the
> copyright and does not share the code with other organizations. If
> someone is aware that this interpretation is incorrect, or sees some
> obvious pitfalls, please clarify as necessary.
This is our understanding of the GPL.
To reiterate, private modifications, retained within a single
organisation are not subject to the GPL. It's only if you choose to
distribute those changes does the GPL come into effect.
-- geoff
http://www.daemon.com.au/PS. I am not a lawyer! This is not legal advice :)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to
farcry-dev@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
farcry-dev-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
