On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Roland Weber <
ossfwot@...> wrote:
> Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> > Hi Dims,
> >
> > This looks good, so let me comment specifically on things that IMO need
> clarification.
> >
> > On May 5, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> > > #2: Create and maintain a charter that governs the PMC/project(s)
> > >
> >
> > That's probably obsolete. I recall seeing some TLP's having a charter, but
> I don't think that's an ongoing practice. All projects are part of a single
> org (ASF) after all.
> >
>
> I believe that "bylaws" are required. At least the creation of
> bylaws is mentioned in the TLP resolutions I have read last year.
> While all projects are part of the ASF, they still have different
> ways to handle code review, release preparation, project plans,
> and so on.
> A "charter" serves to define the scope of a project, but I've
> seen projects that just use their TLP resolution to that end.
> Of course I've also seen both terms being used interchangeably :-)
i think
http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html are the bylaws referred to
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
general-help@...