> Hi,
>
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Tobias Bocanegra
> <
tobias.bocanegra@...> wrote:
> > i think this will be a huge rewrite which will imply months of
> > instability and testing, and i frankly don't know if it's worth it.
> > additionally, wouldn't it compromise the NG data model?
>
>
> I think this would fit fairly well with NG (I'm not sure if I've noted
> it anywhere, but I've always thought of NGP as being bundle-based),
> and we could use this as an iterative step towards it.
oh really? i though it's better to have very fine difference sets. for
example adding a new property to a "big" node, would only result in
'add property' as a difference, but when you have bundles, you would
have to store the entire bundle as diff.
> (Another potential iterative step could be for example storing entire
> bundles in the journal, and implementing a persistence manager that
> gets its content from the journal instead of a separate storage.)
..and the changelog. so that the modifications of a transaction are
direclty store the the journaled persistence manager and the commit
would result it marking the changes as active.
> I'm not sure whether this kind of a refactoring would be worth the
> effort, or if we should just look at doing a rewrite from the ground
> at some point in the future. Instinctively I'd prefer an iterative
> approach.
me, too.
--
regards, toby
