On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 01:36:09PM -0700, Jerome Peace wrote:
> assertions
>
> " each location in a most one morph"
This assertion appears to conflict with
> "a location is a sublocation of its owner"
and
> "more that one morph may share a location."
if one is using world-relative locations. Is this not the case?
What is a location? Parent morph + relative 2d location?
Also, what is in a Parent morph? location + rotation + shear +
scale? or is there some more general transform system that
could handle funky stuff like jiggly morphs, or allow morphs to
be 2.5d? That would be nice.
--
Matthew Fulmer --
http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/Help improve Squeak Documentation:
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/808_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
Morphic@...
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
