Tx for the answers
>> - do you work with the tweak tools? Since I found the navigation
>> missing for example in the users of...
>>
>
> I avoid them. I really, really tried to develop using the Tweak IDE
> tools, but this is an unfinished area. The good news is that you
> don't have to. All the Morphic tools have been patched to be Tweak-
> compliant (so they could build the initial Tweak components, I
> suppose)! I found developing in Morphic and running in Tweak to be
> a perfectly viable solution. Even the Transcript talks across
> worlds. The only real limitation I have found with that model is
> that what you run in Tweak must be instantiated and live in the
> Tweak world.
Ok I prefer that.
>> - I read the code of CPainter and this is a pleasure to rid
>>
>> - What blue means for the instance variables?
>
> The color coding is free form, but it is suggested to color them to
> reflect their 'type' (option-click over them to see choices).
I read the bank account but there is italic, bold, normal but not
blue hence my question
>> - I could not saved (fileout the code) only method but not class
>> category or class. Is it normal?
>>
>
> You tried in Tweak right?
Sure :)
> Drop to Morphic, it works there (and works fine on Tweak classes).
> For this reason (and others) I recommend avoiding the 'Tweak
> Project' in favor of the 'Tweak Project Window' since the latter
> gives you easy access to both worlds.
>
>> Some small feedback (tweak 1-2 update 590)
>>
>> - the creation of window or some widgets seems slow, there are
>> some flashes, is it normal?
>
> I'm convinced the Tools are double-instantiated. It seems the
> initial in-hand copy gets lost, and a new one is instantiated upon
> drop, or something else is happening to run the init code twice. I
> hate the paradigm anyway...I'm always annoyed when something
> suddenly appears glued to my mouse cursor that I didn't put there.
>
>>
>> - sometimes I got slow redraws of part of the screen, is it normal?
>
> With the Tweak IDE Tools, yes (but Morphic can be slow to redraw,
> say, dependent panes in browsers remote to a changed items too).
> But with your own application, no. We have found the interface to
> be quite responsive. Hermes (IMAP email client) is almost as fast
> as my desktop (Apple's Mail.app client). There is an issue with the
> event loop scheduling being a little tight in 'Tweak Project' that
> causes some os user process hogging (and Morphic events to be
> totally suspended). Other than those things, it is pretty well
> behaved.
OK
>> - the paintool does not draw correctly its subcomponents
>>
>> - I created a "sketmorph" and play with the menu and created a
>> tile for this object. But I could not destroy it (pressing the x
>> halo morph
>> did not work)
>
>> - I downloaded the latest version and clicked on update: it
>> udpated but now I do not have the update
>> option anymore. Is is normal?
>
> No. The Menus should be invariant. I do remember a bug I saw awhile
> back that dropped parts of the menu, but have not seen this lately.
> Fix was to throw away the world, but I think there is a 'Restore
> World Menu' that does the right thing.
?
>> I was wondering
>>
>> why we get
>> onLayoutChanged
>> | box |
>> <on: layoutChanged>
>> box := self localBounds insetBy: borderWidth.
>> board bounds: box.
>> palette topRight: box topRight.
>>
>> and not
>>
>> onLayoutChanged
>> <on: layoutChanged>
>>
>> | box |
>> box := self localBounds insetBy: borderWidth.
>> board bounds: box.
>> palette topRight: box topRight.
>>
>>
>> Feedback on the bank account tutorial
>> ============================
>> "and second, accessor methods (#balance and #balance:) have been
>> automatically generated."
>> the browser did not refresh correctly I was seeing them until I
>> reclicked on the class
>>
>
> Again, You were looking at a Tweak browser? Try the same experiment
> in a Morphic browser. To be fair, Morphic has some missed redraws
> as well, just fewer of them.
>
> With just a few months in Tweak (well, Squeak too) I'm far from an
> expert. I don't have a history using Morphic (or MVC). Smalltalk
> was a survey language that was interesting from my school days and
> some later independent study. So, I'm a newby. Sort of.
>
> But the first time I changed a value in an object buried deep in a
> collection, and had the visual representation of that change show
> up in the UI widget the right way, and quickly, and after I had
> done absolutely nothing to make it so (other than integrate the
> widget correctly), I was hooked.
I know I like the idea of active value.
I just do not like the XML in the class def when we could have
smalltalk code but this is easily fixable.
>
> Hope this helps.
Thanks
>
> Eric Fournier
> Java and Web Services
:)
> University of Minnesota Office of Information Technology
> 190 Shepherd Labs
>
>
emf@...
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Tweak mailing list
Tweak@...
http://impara.de/mailman/listinfo/tweak