« Return to Thread: Custom WiFi Board
Re: Custom WiFi Board
by Marc Humphreys
::
Rate this Message:
First check you have the wifi module plugged in the right way. It can mate
with the connector both ways, and you may have inadvertently rotated the
footprint in your design to the intend orientation you hoped for.
The H version of the buffer has bus hold logic in it. The population of the
H version in one batch of netwifi-uSD cards I believe is exactly why there
was a recall ( for lack a of a better term) on those boards.
Hope that helps,
Marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gumstix-users-bounces@... [mailto:gumstix-users-
> bounces@...] On Behalf Of voorhies
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 9:57 PM
> To: gumstix-users@...
> Subject: [Gumstix-users] Custom WiFi Board
>
>
> I just created a custom carrier board for my Verdex XL6P based off of the
> netwifimicroSD eagle schematics that are posted, and am having trouble
> with
> the Marvell WiFi module. I removed the LAN9117 and RJ45 jack from the
> schematics, but otherwise left them pretty much intact, adding only a
> Propeller, some motor drivers and a few other things here and there that
> are
> completely unrelated to the bus that the WiFi module is on. I've gone over
> all of the obvious problem points (solder connections, etc..) and
> everything
> checks out, so I seem to have done something fundamentally wrong. The only
> other difference is that I had to use the TI WAH4245 instead of the WB4245
> as the level translators because I couldn't find the WB anywhere, but a
> look
> at the datasheets tells me that they should be equivalent. Does the wifi
> module rely on the LAN9117 chip at all? Has anyone had any successes
> creating their own wifi boards?
>
> Thanks!
> Rand
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Custom-WiFi-Board-
> tp17395890p17395890.html
> Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> gumstix-users mailing list
> gumstix-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
gumstix-users mailing list
gumstix-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users
with the connector both ways, and you may have inadvertently rotated the
footprint in your design to the intend orientation you hoped for.
The H version of the buffer has bus hold logic in it. The population of the
H version in one batch of netwifi-uSD cards I believe is exactly why there
was a recall ( for lack a of a better term) on those boards.
Hope that helps,
Marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gumstix-users-bounces@... [mailto:gumstix-users-
> bounces@...] On Behalf Of voorhies
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 9:57 PM
> To: gumstix-users@...
> Subject: [Gumstix-users] Custom WiFi Board
>
>
> I just created a custom carrier board for my Verdex XL6P based off of the
> netwifimicroSD eagle schematics that are posted, and am having trouble
> with
> the Marvell WiFi module. I removed the LAN9117 and RJ45 jack from the
> schematics, but otherwise left them pretty much intact, adding only a
> Propeller, some motor drivers and a few other things here and there that
> are
> completely unrelated to the bus that the WiFi module is on. I've gone over
> all of the obvious problem points (solder connections, etc..) and
> everything
> checks out, so I seem to have done something fundamentally wrong. The only
> other difference is that I had to use the TI WAH4245 instead of the WB4245
> as the level translators because I couldn't find the WB anywhere, but a
> look
> at the datasheets tells me that they should be equivalent. Does the wifi
> module rely on the LAN9117 chip at all? Has anyone had any successes
> creating their own wifi boards?
>
> Thanks!
> Rand
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Custom-WiFi-Board-
> tp17395890p17395890.html
> Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> gumstix-users mailing list
> gumstix-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
gumstix-users mailing list
gumstix-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users
« Return to Thread: Custom WiFi Board
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |